If if…I personally like Undertaker-Batista matches b/c the two of them work great together. Why Taker would have to drop the title in order to face Jericho seems kind of nefarious to me? I understand WWE has to sell the fight, and this includes high-profile title matches in addition to the epic clashes we’ve seen over the years like Steamboat-Savage, Rock-Hogan, and Undertaker-HBK. But why not let two great ring veterans put it all on the line for the belt. Maybe, allow Jericho to adopt the “Ayatollah of Rock n Rolla” persona we saw in the early 2000s as a heel up against the LOD Undertaker (lose the hat or keep it like he did in the early years of the LOD period, but keep the sleeveless jacket.)

I Hope Taker stays at least till two smackdowns the rumble. I’m going to the smackdown in cincinnati after rumble and have not yet seen the LOD and I just want to see him once before the sad day when he……………. well I don’t want to say the R word, but the day when he leaves us.
Wish me luck!

Jericho as an enormous threat for The Streak? That’s funny, really.

The other potential opponent for Taker at WM 26 is definitely Jericho, but seeing how in the last three weeks Taker defeated Jericho thrice already:

Smackdown!, 11/13/09 : The Undertaker defeated Jericho after The Hell’s Gate.
Survivor Series, 11/22/09: The Undertaker defeated Big Show & Chris Jericho in a Triple Threat.
SD!, 11/27/09: The Undertaker defeated Jericho by DQ after Batista interrupted the match.

I don’t think anyone would be dumb enough to think that Jericho can defeat The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 26 if he couldn’t do it at SD! or Survivor Series after Taker defeated him three times in three separate occasions, cause at Wrestlemania you don’t just face the usual Undertaker, you face Wrestlemania’s Undertaker which devoured 17 victims in a row. If u can’t beat the usual Undertaker then the fourth, fifth, or sixth match (cause there’s no guarantee they won’t face each other again at SD!) against Wrestlemania’s Undertaker will certainly be as predictable as Taker vs Henry at WM 22.

In my opinion, they should have kept Undertaker/Jericho until the beginning of 2010 so it would keep the match and storyline a little more interesting. Losing to Taker and not ever winning just makes the Wrestlemania match more broing. Lets go back to the last 5 opponents of Undertaker at Wrestlemania…..

Randy Orton: He has never faced the Undertaker at that time. He was known as the legend killer and The Undertaker was known as the Legend. Orton had a great chance of ending Undertaker’s streak in my eyes. The match had a lot of hype and the match was great.

Mark Henry: This was another wrestler the Undertaker never wrestled against ever since his return. It might not have been a great feud and it was random match. Other than Undertaker vs Giant Gonzales, this is the one that had no point.

Batista: Undertaker and Batista in my opinion is the feud of 2007 in my opinion. Batista posed as a strong threat at ending his streak. They had matches in tag teams and they never faced off against each other. The storyline was hyped and the match was great.

Edge: They had back and forth matches and won championships against each other. Undertaker/Edge was a great storyline and feud.

Shawn Michaels: The man who had the most potential to beat the Deadman and end his streak at Wrestlemania. They haven’t been in many matches together. Going into the match, Undertaker has never beaten Shawn Michaels in a singles match.

Besides Mark Henry, all of those superstars had something in their resume that poses a threat to Taker’s streak. If Chris Jericho never beats Undertaker before Wrestlemania, the match might be good, but it will also be predictable.

He failed thrice, no one is going to believe he is a behemoth threat for The Streak anymore.

I’m still marking and believing for Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania 26.

I personally don’t care whether or not Undertaker faces Jericho at Mania b/c BATISTA WILL BE THE WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION!!!! Sorry guys just stating facts…if you guys think that the big-man was a jerk before just wait till you see him face Taker at TLC as a heel, b/c he is going to unleash the REAL ANIMAL, the one who just doesnt care and tears guys apart and rips their heads off!!!

NEWS FLASH THE UNDERTAKER IS NOT INVINCIBLE!!!!!! Yes he is good, he is very good…but not unbeatable.

Actually i like batista as a heel. Face batista is boring.

Mr. 0 wrote:

Jericho as an enormous threat for The Streak? That’s funny, really.

The other potential opponent for Taker at WM 26 is definitely Jericho, but seeing how in the last three weeks Taker defeated Jericho thrice already:

Smackdown!, 11/13/09 : The Undertaker defeated Jericho after The Hell’s Gate.
Survivor Series, 11/22/09: The Undertaker defeated Big Show & Chris Jericho in a Triple Threat.
SD!, 11/27/09: The Undertaker defeated Jericho by DQ after Batista interrupted the match.

I don’t think anyone would be dumb enough to think that Jericho can defeat The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 26 if he couldn’t do it at SD! or Survivor Series after Taker defeated him three times in three separate occasions, cause at Wrestlemania you don’t just face the usual Undertaker, you face Wrestlemania’s Undertaker which devoured 17 victims in a row. If u can’t beat the usual Undertaker then the fourth, fifth, or sixth match (cause there’s no guarantee they won’t face each other again at SD!) against Wrestlemania’s Undertaker will certainly be as predictable as Taker vs Henry at WM 22.

In my opinion, they should have kept Undertaker/Jericho until the beginning of 2010 so it would keep the match and storyline a little more interesting. Losing to Taker and not ever winning just makes the Wrestlemania match more broing. Lets go back to the last 5 opponents of Undertaker at Wrestlemania…..

Randy Orton: He has never faced the Undertaker at that time. He was known as the legend killer and The Undertaker was known as the Legend. Orton had a great chance of ending Undertaker’s streak in my eyes. The match had a lot of hype and the match was great.

Mark Henry: This was another wrestler the Undertaker never wrestled against ever since his return. It might not have been a great feud and it was random match. Other than Undertaker vs Giant Gonzales, this is the one that had no point.

Batista: Undertaker and Batista in my opinion is the feud of 2007 in my opinion. Batista posed as a strong threat at ending his streak. They had matches in tag teams and they never faced off against each other. The storyline was hyped and the match was great.

Edge: They had back and forth matches and won championships against each other. Undertaker/Edge was a great storyline and feud.

Shawn Michaels: The man who had the most potential to beat the Deadman and end his streak at Wrestlemania. They haven’t been in many matches together. Going into the match, Undertaker has never beaten Shawn Michaels in a singles match.

Besides Mark Henry, all of those superstars had something in their resume that poses a threat to Taker’s streak. If Chris Jericho never beats Undertaker before Wrestlemania, the match might be good, but it will also be predictable.

He failed thrice, no one is going to believe he is a behemoth threat for The Streak anymore.

I’m still marking and believing for Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania 26.

I agree with you

UT will at RR as well as EC reigning supreme at both PPVS as well as WM ofcourse

he there people i like to say out off respect too eki fatu,s fam ,sad that a great wrestler has passed on,
we in holland of the undertaker4ever hyves support you in these rugh times,

umaga we will miss you man…..R.I.P

R.I.P UMAGA
BTW METALLICA RULES

i guess Umaga Undertaker feud will never happen write in history books

The one ,The only ,The Man, the legenD, The Phenom , The Undertaker will be world champ forever.
Hey Hey Hey !
Just wait a second ,Why should we accept the idea of Taker being defeated at RR just to give the title to Batista because in a year WWE creative team had arranged the heel turn of Batista & if they don’t give the title to Batista ,their effort in doing the heel turn will go for nothing << Here we have to Stop & Say << What is the realtion between that heel & Our Taker title reign , it's not Undertaker or us fault in making that turn & we are not responsible for it's bad coming because we want Taker to be champion ,we don't have any relation with that batista & the effort the WWE creative team made to create that heel Batista & you say if he doesn't get the title ,there wll be no mean for that heel turn ,,
Why you interrelate that with The Undertaker title reign ??

Undertaker is not responsible for that creation ,so we are & Why are we calling him to get defeated bad defeat to batista to save that heel turn ???

When is the time The undertaker gonna to stop helping the other & LOOk at his own Look at us ,he can refuse to drop the title ,but if that happens ,why wouldn't he??
We want you, Undertaker, as a champion .

I really hate that theory .Here you talked about how Batista did all things for over a half a year to get that title again.

**** Here is Why Undertaker should have his title till WM 26 & after :
* Undertaker has been screwed over his career many millions times & never get the title barring 7 times only ,
A legend for over 20 years didn't get the title barring 7 times , compare that & how many times edge got the title ,, That suck edge !!

** Undertaker character & carisma & his atheltic & billions of his fans all over the world can make WWE Smackdown show better from ratings to all another things than that batista .

*** All wrestling fans want to see Undertaker a champ for more months ,look & compare how many months John Cena hold WWE belt for over a year !! & here after only 2 months we calling the man to drop off the title ,

**** Undertaker has some injuries that banned him to take his long title reign ,now he is very good & in his top form <<at that perfect time we are calling the man to get defeated bad defeat from batista only to make the build of that suck Jerico who undertaker defeated him 3 times till now ,
& how badly is that idea of UNDERTAKER vs jerico @ wm 26 ?? hey we have watched that in sd ,why we have to watch it again in our Wrestlemania dream ??

*&*&*&* PLEASE ,WWE you can get billions from undertaker being champion but because you don't have any new or any creativity ,you are making wwe go to bad & from bad to worse & …. !!!!

anyway ,I say to WWE creative team ,SUCK YOU !!

I have a question.What after WM 26?My idea is just to hunt Batista if Taker loses unfortunately the WHC at the RR,i mean if Batista is the champ post WM.The thing i regret is that Edge is the missing link in the story,he might return for the WM event,he might come for Backlash…..I m not implicating for another Taker-Edge story,no thank you we had that a year ago,and all of us were frustrated by the actions of him and Vickie,so my proposal is to if according to the blog Taker gets out out of the spotlight just to have a match with Jericho,the idea is good,but most of the audience will cheer for Taker,there are Jericho fans but it would ruin the WM 26 tag line,and the WM 26 match would be “oh my god a heel wants to end a streak,oh is Jericho,and people would say another victim of Taker’s dominance….I prefer Cena,because the heat would be bigger and the audience is going to be ok mostly for Taker,but it would be much more interesting….To watch build up for the match….Wait didn’t Edge said that when he comes back he ll go after Jericho?Just a question,maybe Edge can comeback for Edge vs Jericho AT WM….

im disgusted.
the undertaker has never been this degraded before by any wrestler in wwe history.instead the undertaker dominates other wrestlers.im really shamed to call taker the phenom at this point.
taker is out of shape and i could hardly see a strong muscle in his body.his chest is weak, and his weight has reduced.
batista ,hhh,cena and even micheals look better.
taker shuld leave the belt and concentrate on his health .
wat u guyz think

GAME wrote:

im disgusted.
the undertaker has never been this degraded before by any wrestler in wwe history.instead the undertaker dominates other wrestlers.im really shamed to call taker the phenom at this point.
taker is out of shape and i could hardly see a strong muscle in his body.his chest is weak, and his weight has reduced.
batista ,hhh,cena and even micheals look better.
taker shuld leave the belt and concentrate on his health .
wat u guyz think

Taker looked worse in 2008, he was very lean backthen. Now, taker is bigger than he was during 2008, his muscles looks better now.

In my opinion, taker looked at his best during ministry era. He had more muscles, his body weight was around 330-340 lbs, and a lot of girls said taker was very sexy those days.

Icang wrote:

GAME wrote:

im disgusted.
the undertaker has never been this degraded before by any wrestler in wwe history.instead the undertaker dominates other wrestlers.im really shamed to call taker the phenom at this point.
taker is out of shape and i could hardly see a strong muscle in his body.his chest is weak, and his weight has reduced.
batista ,hhh,cena and even micheals look better.
taker shuld leave the belt and concentrate on his health .
wat u guyz think

Taker looked worse in 2008, he was very lean backthen. Now, taker is bigger than he was during 2008, his muscles looks better now.

In my opinion, taker looked at his best during ministry era. He had more muscles, his body weight was around 330-340 lbs, and a lot of girls said taker was very sexy those days.

Well he looks stronger now than in 2008.
I don’t agree with the thing you said about the muscles. his arms look stronger.
As to the rest: sorry to tell you man but he’s getting older. you can’t expect a 44 year old man to look or have the physical shape as a 30 year old.

and btw, Batista has lost weight too^^
you can clearly see that at his pectoral muscles.^^
In addition, I DO think Taker should be able to keep the title still for some time. He deserves it.

Im thinking that you still could be right about the Kane-Undertaker feud at TLC, Ithink that Kane will interfere and cost ‘taker the title.

Mr. 0 wrote:

Jericho as an enormous threat for The Streak? That’s funny, really.

The other potential opponent for Taker at WM 26 is definitely Jericho, but seeing how in the last three weeks Taker defeated Jericho thrice already:

Smackdown!, 11/13/09 : The Undertaker defeated Jericho after The Hell’s Gate.
Survivor Series, 11/22/09: The Undertaker defeated Big Show & Chris Jericho in a Triple Threat.
SD!, 11/27/09: The Undertaker defeated Jericho by DQ after Batista interrupted the match.

I don’t think anyone would be dumb enough to think that Jericho can defeat The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 26 if he couldn’t do it at SD! or Survivor Series after Taker defeated him three times in three separate occasions, cause at Wrestlemania you don’t just face the usual Undertaker, you face Wrestlemania’s Undertaker which devoured 17 victims in a row. If u can’t beat the usual Undertaker then the fourth, fifth, or sixth match (cause there’s no guarantee they won’t face each other again at SD!) against Wrestlemania’s Undertaker will certainly be as predictable as Taker vs Henry at WM 22.

In my opinion, they should have kept Undertaker/Jericho until the beginning of 2010 so it would keep the match and storyline a little more interesting. Losing to Taker and not ever winning just makes the Wrestlemania match more broing. Lets go back to the last 5 opponents of Undertaker at Wrestlemania…..

Randy Orton: He has never faced the Undertaker at that time. He was known as the legend killer and The Undertaker was known as the Legend. Orton had a great chance of ending Undertaker’s streak in my eyes. The match had a lot of hype and the match was great.

Mark Henry: This was another wrestler the Undertaker never wrestled against ever since his return. It might not have been a great feud and it was random match. Other than Undertaker vs Giant Gonzales, this is the one that had no point.

Batista: Undertaker and Batista in my opinion is the feud of 2007 in my opinion. Batista posed as a strong threat at ending his streak. They had matches in tag teams and they never faced off against each other. The storyline was hyped and the match was great.

Edge: They had back and forth matches and won championships against each other. Undertaker/Edge was a great storyline and feud.

Shawn Michaels: The man who had the most potential to beat the Deadman and end his streak at Wrestlemania. They haven’t been in many matches together. Going into the match, Undertaker has never beaten Shawn Michaels in a singles match.

Besides Mark Henry, all of those superstars had something in their resume that poses a threat to Taker’s streak. If Chris Jericho never beats Undertaker before Wrestlemania, the match might be good, but it will also be predictable.

He failed thrice, no one is going to believe he is a behemoth threat for The Streak anymore.

I’m still marking and believing for Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania 26.

See,

WWE matches are not real, they are choreographed and booked. May be Taker might have defeated Jericho thrice, but if WWE wants to make look Jericho stronger they might make him win as well. It’s no big deal.

We all know that Kozlov is no match when compared to Taker. But he scored two wins against Taker this year — one a DQ win; two a CLEAN PINFALL win.

And above all, before Taker wins WM matches he will either job to wrestlers in PPV before WM or after WM. For example, he jobbed to Batista after WM 23, he jobbed to Edge/Big Show after WM 24, He jobbed to Austin for the rest of the year after his WM match with Kane. Before the classical Shawn vs Taker match before WM 25, Taker jobbed to Triple H and Kozlov in NWO and SD resp.

So he might job to Batista/Jericho, get chairshots from Jericho and get insulted by Jericho until Mania and probably settle the scores with a clean win at Mania.

As far as John Cena is concerned, well it doesn’t look possible for the moment that he might face Taker. If so, he might have dropped the title at SS 09. He for sure will not lose to Shaemus. Because Shaemus had already had the first laught by putting Cena through the Table. So for sure we can see Shaemus being Attitude Adjusted by Cena through a Table at TLC 09.

A Taker/Cena match at WM for Brand Supremacy will look monotonous. See, we must see different types of WM matches which will make Taker matches sell. Already Taker has had BRAND SUPREMACY match with Kane, Orton, Michaels in different WM matches. So this year would be another repeat. So I am of the opinion that Taker might fight with an opponent within the SD brand.

U have missed other opponents like King Kong Bundy, Big Boss Man, etc. who did not add a lot of flare to Taker’s WM matches.

Undertaker_rulz wrote:

Icang wrote:

GAME wrote:

im disgusted.
the undertaker has never been this degraded before by any wrestler in wwe history.instead the undertaker dominates other wrestlers.im really shamed to call taker the phenom at this point.
taker is out of shape and i could hardly see a strong muscle in his body.his chest is weak, and his weight has reduced.
batista ,hhh,cena and even micheals look better.
taker shuld leave the belt and concentrate on his health .
wat u guyz think

Taker looked worse in 2008, he was very lean backthen. Now, taker is bigger than he was during 2008, his muscles looks better now.

In my opinion, taker looked at his best during ministry era. He had more muscles, his body weight was around 330-340 lbs, and a lot of girls said taker was very sexy those days.

Well he looks stronger now than in 2008.
I don’t agree with the thing you said about the muscles. his arms look stronger.
As to the rest: sorry to tell you man but he’s getting older. you can’t expect a 44 year old man to look or have the physical shape as a 30 year old.

and btw, Batista has lost weight too^^
you can clearly see that at his pectoral muscles.^^
In addition, I DO think Taker should be able to keep the title still for some time. He deserves it.

My friend, that just my opinion. I don’t expect taker to go 340 lbs again. That’s impossible. And many wrestlers are losing weight except kane. Kane is still at 320 lbs range.

Back to the topic:
Honestly i want taker to retain the belt until anytime after mania.

Undertaker is not like other wrestlers. he is a super human extra ordinary character. especially the character says about the undertaker is ‘eternal’. and the undertaker of 90′s was eternal. since his hybrid persona i rarely see eternality, forget about his biker human days that was entirely out of his character.

GAME wrote:

im disgusted.
the undertaker has never been this degraded before by any wrestler in wwe history.instead the undertaker dominates other wrestlers.im really shamed to call taker the phenom at this point.
taker is out of shape and i could hardly see a strong muscle in his body.his chest is weak, and his weight has reduced.
batista ,hhh,cena and even micheals look better.
taker shuld leave the belt and concentrate on his health .
wat u guyz think

He looked worse in 2002-2003, he was practically Lesnar’s b*tch.

Alex wrote:

Mr. 0 wrote:

Jericho as an enormous threat for The Streak? That’s funny, really.

The other potential opponent for Taker at WM 26 is definitely Jericho, but seeing how in the last three weeks Taker defeated Jericho thrice already:

Smackdown!, 11/13/09 : The Undertaker defeated Jericho after The Hell’s Gate.
Survivor Series, 11/22/09: The Undertaker defeated Big Show & Chris Jericho in a Triple Threat.
SD!, 11/27/09: The Undertaker defeated Jericho by DQ after Batista interrupted the match.

I don’t think anyone would be dumb enough to think that Jericho can defeat The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 26 if he couldn’t do it at SD! or Survivor Series after Taker defeated him three times in three separate occasions, cause at Wrestlemania you don’t just face the usual Undertaker, you face Wrestlemania’s Undertaker which devoured 17 victims in a row. If u can’t beat the usual Undertaker then the fourth, fifth, or sixth match (cause there’s no guarantee they won’t face each other again at SD!) against Wrestlemania’s Undertaker will certainly be as predictable as Taker vs Henry at WM 22.

In my opinion, they should have kept Undertaker/Jericho until the beginning of 2010 so it would keep the match and storyline a little more interesting. Losing to Taker and not ever winning just makes the Wrestlemania match more broing. Lets go back to the last 5 opponents of Undertaker at Wrestlemania…..

Randy Orton: He has never faced the Undertaker at that time. He was known as the legend killer and The Undertaker was known as the Legend. Orton had a great chance of ending Undertaker’s streak in my eyes. The match had a lot of hype and the match was great.

Mark Henry: This was another wrestler the Undertaker never wrestled against ever since his return. It might not have been a great feud and it was random match. Other than Undertaker vs Giant Gonzales, this is the one that had no point.

Batista: Undertaker and Batista in my opinion is the feud of 2007 in my opinion. Batista posed as a strong threat at ending his streak. They had matches in tag teams and they never faced off against each other. The storyline was hyped and the match was great.

Edge: They had back and forth matches and won championships against each other. Undertaker/Edge was a great storyline and feud.

Shawn Michaels: The man who had the most potential to beat the Deadman and end his streak at Wrestlemania. They haven’t been in many matches together. Going into the match, Undertaker has never beaten Shawn Michaels in a singles match.

Besides Mark Henry, all of those superstars had something in their resume that poses a threat to Taker’s streak. If Chris Jericho never beats Undertaker before Wrestlemania, the match might be good, but it will also be predictable.

He failed thrice, no one is going to believe he is a behemoth threat for The Streak anymore.

I’m still marking and believing for Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania 26.

See,

WWE matches are not real, they are choreographed and booked. May be Taker might have defeated Jericho thrice, but if WWE wants to make look Jericho stronger they might make him win as well. It’s no big deal.

We all know that Kozlov is no match when compared to Taker. But he scored two wins against Taker this year — one a DQ win; two a CLEAN PINFALL win.

And above all, before Taker wins WM matches he will either job to wrestlers in PPV before WM or after WM. For example, he jobbed to Batista after WM 23, he jobbed to Edge/Big Show after WM 24, He jobbed to Austin for the rest of the year after his WM match with Kane. Before the classical Shawn vs Taker match before WM 25, Taker jobbed to Triple H and Kozlov in NWO and SD resp.

So he might job to Batista/Jericho, get chairshots from Jericho and get insulted by Jericho until Mania and probably settle the scores with a clean win at Mania.

As far as John Cena is concerned, well it doesn’t look possible for the moment that he might face Taker. If so, he might have dropped the title at SS 09. He for sure will not lose to Shaemus. Because Shaemus had already had the first laught by putting Cena through the Table. So for sure we can see Shaemus being Attitude Adjusted by Cena through a Table at TLC 09.

A Taker/Cena match at WM for Brand Supremacy will look monotonous. See, we must see different types of WM matches which will make Taker matches sell. Already Taker has had BRAND SUPREMACY match with Kane, Orton, Michaels in different WM matches. So this year would be another repeat. So I am of the opinion that Taker might fight with an opponent within the SD brand.

U have missed other opponents like King Kong Bundy, Big Boss Man, etc. who did not add a lot of flare to Taker’s WM matches.

Since u mentioned something about Taker’s past opponents, does that mean you’re OK with another one who can’t add a flare?

Henry was pushed to the sky by beaten the crap out of Batista and Angle before his match at WM 22 against Taker, but did anyone buy the possibility of him ending The Streak? No. Why? Cause he has been a loser all his career before his overrated return in late 2005, and Taker pawned him right before No Way Out on a tag team match.

Big Show injured Taker by the end of 2002, and even after getting the help of his lover (A-Train, who should have been shaving his back) at WM 19, did anyone buy the possibility of him ending The Streak? No. Why? Cause Taker has defeated him many times before.

Why was Diesel considered a threat for The Streak? Cause they’ve never met before, and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Why was Sid considered a threat for The Streak? Cause they rarely met before, Taker NEVER won against him, and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Why was Masked Kane considered a threat for The Streak? Cause they’ve never met before, and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Why was HHH considered a threat for The Streak? Cause they rarely met before, and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Why was Flair considered a threat for The Streak? Cause they’ve never met before, and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Why was Orton considered a threat for The Streak? Cause they’ve never met before, and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Why was Batista considered a threat for The Streak? Cause they’ve never met before, and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Why was Edge considered a threat for The Streak? Cause they’ve never met before, Edge always outsmarted Taker, and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Why was HBK considered a threat for The Streak? Cause Taker has NEVER defeated him before and we wouldn’t know if Taker was capable of defeating him.

Don’t u see it at all? TAKER HAS DEFEATED JERICHO THREE TIMES!!! He has done it before, what makes people think he can’t do it again regardless how much WWE try to build him up? CAUSE IT ALREADY HAPPENED!!

The last but not the least, Cena will definitely win against Sheamus, but is there any guarantee at all he wouldn’t lose it to any other RAW main eventers at Royal Rumble or Elimination Chamber?

I’m a fan of Taker just like everybody here, but due all respect, if Taker faces Jericho at WM 26, I might as well go to sleep regardless the quality of the match because I know who will celebrate by the end of the match without even watching it.

Jericho has been defeated by The Undertaker before, he cannot add an ounce of threat for The Streak. But a different story with Cena, am I right? That’s why I’m marking for Cena vs Taker.

Well, but since we’re entitled to our own opinion, please apologize me if any of my words offends u.

But really, if u want to see the Undertaker’s most predictable match since Henry at WM 22 then be my guest.

See,

I agree with all your points.

I am talking from WWE business’ perspective. I am not against Taker vs Cena. If WWE guys are planning on a Taker/Cena match, so be it. I am for it.

But logically speaking, Cena is a title material like The Rock or Austin. If Taker and Cena would duck it out, it would mostly be for the title. If Cena is to challenge Taker for the title @ WM 26, then he must switch brands or win the Rumble.

In my opinion switching brands is out of question, and there is only a little possibility when it comes to Cena winning the Rumble.

Speaking of Rumble, well a lot depends on the results of the Rumble. If Jericho is somehow involved in either winning the Rumble or interfering in Taker’s matches, then I am 100% sure that it’s going to be a Taker vs Jericho WM 26.

On the other hand, if either Cena or Taker or both lose the title, then the chances for a Cena/Taker rivlary is more.

Because, if both guys are going to drop the title, both will definitely attempt a rematch for the title again. Because, both guys are big guys, both are crowd favorites, and they will lose only through unfair means. This will lead to rematches, in the following PPV. When these two wrestlers take more PPV focussing on Rematches then they won’t have any time for a Taker/Cena build up.

These are the reasons why, I ve been sceptical about a Taker/Cena WM 26. Apart from that, Taker/Cena WM 26 will be fun only if it is for the title. If it is for some brand supremacy then it will look boring because Taker has already had a lot of brand supremacy matches with Kane, Orton, and Michaels.

In your previous post in this forum, you’ve been repeating words they’ve never met before. Well, if you look deep into history, before Taker’s WM matches — Taker and Michaels have met before, Taker and Edge have met before, Taker and Orton have met before, and if Taker and Cena are going to duck it out, even Taker and Cena have met many million times before (both as Big Evil and as The Dead Man gimmicks) before.

But the WWE often conceals the above facts, and they maintain that Taker vs Wrestler X haven’t met before, just to spice up the WM match. Most likely be it Cena or Jericho or Orton or Austin or Rock, WWE in most cases will keep the streak alive until Taker retires. So regardless of who the wrestler is he is going to lose against Taker in WM matches.

But how to spice things up? They must question the viewers minds on whether or not Taker will maintain his streak. Well that strongly depends on storyline part. If some Wrestler X is shown as a stronger opponent and is a threat for Taker’s streak, it is only the storyline that would breath life into that aspect and not the opponent on a whole.

Only in that regards, I am telling you that Jericho can be a better match as he has good storytelling abilities as well as good wrestling skills. Therefore Taker and Jericho can put up good storylines that will lead them to WM. Lot of emotions will soar between the two wrestlers because in addition to their fighting capabilities, they have excellent in-ring gimmicks. It is only in this regards I vote for a Taker/Jericho rivalry.

With regards to a Cena/Taker WM match, it will be good if, Taker turns heel and Cena as face. Only then Cena can atleast look like a threat to Taker’s streak.

Alex wrote:

See,

I agree with all your points.

I am talking from WWE business’ perspective. I am not against Taker vs Cena. If WWE guys are planning on a Taker/Cena match, so be it. I am for it.

But logically speaking, Cena is a title material like The Rock or Austin. If Taker and Cena would duck it out, it would mostly be for the title. If Cena is to challenge Taker for the title @ WM 26, then he must switch brands or win the Rumble.

In my opinion switching brands is out of question, and there is only a little possibility when it comes to Cena winning the Rumble.

Speaking of Rumble, well a lot depends on the results of the Rumble. If Jericho is somehow involved in either winning the Rumble or interfering in Taker’s matches, then I am 100% sure that it’s going to be a Taker vs Jericho WM 26.

On the other hand, if either Cena or Taker or both lose the title, then the chances for a Cena/Taker rivlary is more.

Because, if both guys are going to drop the title, both will definitely attempt a rematch for the title again. Because, both guys are big guys, both are crowd favorites, and they will lose only through unfair means. This will lead to rematches, in the following PPV. When these two wrestlers take more PPV focussing on Rematches then they won’t have any time for a Taker/Cena build up.

These are the reasons why, I ve been sceptical about a Taker/Cena WM 26. Apart from that, Taker/Cena WM 26 will be fun only if it is for the title. If it is for some brand supremacy then it will look boring because Taker has already had a lot of brand supremacy matches with Kane, Orton, and Michaels.

In your previous post in this forum, you’ve been repeating words they’ve never met before. Well, if you look deep into history, before Taker’s WM matches — Taker and Michaels have met before, Taker and Edge have met before, Taker and Orton have met before, and if Taker and Cena are going to duck it out, even Taker and Cena have met many million times before (both as Big Evil and as The Dead Man gimmicks) before.

But the WWE often conceals the above facts, and they maintain that Taker vs Wrestler X haven’t met before, just to spice up the WM match. Most likely be it Cena or Jericho or Orton or Austin or Rock, WWE in most cases will keep the streak alive until Taker retires. So regardless of who the wrestler is he is going to lose against Taker in WM matches.

But how to spice things up? They must question the viewers minds on whether or not Taker will maintain his streak. Well that strongly depends on storyline part. If some Wrestler X is shown as a stronger opponent and is a threat for Taker’s streak, it is only the storyline that would breath life into that aspect and not the opponent on a whole.

Only in that regards, I am telling you that Jericho can be a better match as he has good storytelling abilities as well as good wrestling skills. Therefore Taker and Jericho can put up good storylines that will lead them to WM. Lot of emotions will soar between the two wrestlers because in addition to their fighting capabilities, they have excellent in-ring gimmicks. It is only in this regards I vote for a Taker/Jericho rivalry.

With regards to a Cena/Taker WM match, it will be good if, Taker turns heel and Cena as face. Only then Cena can atleast look like a threat to Taker’s streak.

Now we finally agree on something, friend.

Respectively speaking, none of the brand supremacy matches u mentioned above was a boring match, that’s why the anticipation is always big and people never got bored of it. And this is an indisputable fact.

And true, Cena is a title material, but his name is big enough that he can provide a draw without titles, much like Hogan, Rock, Bret, and Austin on their respective eras.

Bret vs Austin at WM 13 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.
Hogan vs Rock at WM 18 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.
HBK vs Taker at WM 25 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.

If Taker & Cena lose their titles by interference at Royal Rumble, they will be more than likely not participating in Elimination Chamber but instead taking down the perpetrators at the PPV.

And worry not bout the build up, those matches I mentioned above, especially Hogan vs Rock and HBK vs Taker got their proper build up after No Way Out, no? And both matches turned out to be legendary, right?

True, Jericho’s storytelling ability in the ring is amazing, no one can deny that fact. But Cena’s ability to get any kind of reaction no matter what it is from the crowds is on a class of its own. And no one can deny this fact either. He can connect from the fans no matter what. What he says, what he does, fans will buy it big time.

his is the first time that we’ve had a wrestler —-> fan connection since probably… Rock or SCSA. It’s almost like Allen Iverson with Philly fans, no matter what he does he’ll be loved by ALMOST everyone.

Some heels can’t even generate a boo from the crowd (Abraham Washington, despite the fact that he’s got some killer mic skills) And getting heel heat from a crowd is much easier than getting cheers from a crowd.

I think that Cena represents many things, for a lot of different people. There’s the little kids, who look up to him as a hero. He’s their real life superhero. And then there’s the moms who are happy that their kids are looking up to a guy like Cena. Then you have the fan girls, who scream and wail because of “how hot he is”. Then you’ve got your actual fans, the people who actually appreciate everything that he has done for WWE.

And there is one more thing that Cena got but Jericho not, Cena is introduced as an icon with his overcoming the odds attitude while Jericho isn’t. This mere fact makes John Cena a bigger threat for The Streak than Jericho.

I can’t argue that Jericho vs Taker will be the better quality match any day and anytime just like Taker vs Batista at WM 23 or Taker vs Edge at WM 24.

But no one can argue either that Cena vs Taker will be more legendary, simply because its two of the biggest names in this PG Era facing each other. Although Taker is always one of the biggest names in any era. It will be another icon vs icon. It’s going to be Hogan vs Andre in our time. And it’s a huge moneymaker for Vince. I’m sure the last statement is more than enough to guarantee this match will happen.

I can understand the differences between our view, and I apologize if my previous post somehow offended u. All in all, it’s a nice talk.

I’m waiting for a reply. (^^)

I think Taker will retain the title at TLC and fued against Cena at Wrestlemania! Because I think that a champion vs champion match at Mania would prove to attract much attention from the fanbase! At TLC Batista will Rest in Peace as for Cena against our man Undertaker, he too at Mania will Rest in Peace! Taker 18-0!

This is the finest blog i have read in recent times and the conversion against Mr.O n Alex is great, as i am also a big taker fan but i agree with you both as From wrestling point of view Alex must be right and as for Mr.O is concerned dude i am with because i have also thought about this many times that taker has beaten jericho so many times in these recent weeks so this would not make a wrestlemania 26 match b/w these 2 great because they have face each other many times as Mr.O mentioned in his blog that taker face orton, batista, hbk, edge at wm for the very 1st time and thats why the matches were all outclass but as for jericho vs taker is concerned for wm26 it will be a good match but not an awesome match. So i think the wwe should try to built cena vs taker at wm26 that would be simply awesome to see as what match they should face in, i say it should be a title match because last year hbk vs taker match was a 5 star match (i have never seen a match like this ever n their will never be a match that good) but we can always try to replicate it and only taker vs cena match can be justify for that kind of match up but i am happy whatever wwe choses for taker at wrestlemania as long as they don’t try to make taker lose at mania because as you all know taker is all about the streak and no one i say no one can do that again, i am just watching wrestling for taker n to see him reach 20-0 !!! Look how we (taker’s fan) get emotional so quickly, anyways i am hoping for cena vs taker a title match at Wrestlemania 26

Mr. 0 wrote:

Alex wrote:

See,

I agree with all your points.

I am talking from WWE business’ perspective. I am not against Taker vs Cena. If WWE guys are planning on a Taker/Cena match, so be it. I am for it.

But logically speaking, Cena is a title material like The Rock or Austin. If Taker and Cena would duck it out, it would mostly be for the title. If Cena is to challenge Taker for the title @ WM 26, then he must switch brands or win the Rumble.

In my opinion switching brands is out of question, and there is only a little possibility when it comes to Cena winning the Rumble.

Speaking of Rumble, well a lot depends on the results of the Rumble. If Jericho is somehow involved in either winning the Rumble or interfering in Taker’s matches, then I am 100% sure that it’s going to be a Taker vs Jericho WM 26.

On the other hand, if either Cena or Taker or both lose the title, then the chances for a Cena/Taker rivlary is more.

Because, if both guys are going to drop the title, both will definitely attempt a rematch for the title again. Because, both guys are big guys, both are crowd favorites, and they will lose only through unfair means. This will lead to rematches, in the following PPV. When these two wrestlers take more PPV focussing on Rematches then they won’t have any time for a Taker/Cena build up.

These are the reasons why, I ve been sceptical about a Taker/Cena WM 26. Apart from that, Taker/Cena WM 26 will be fun only if it is for the title. If it is for some brand supremacy then it will look boring because Taker has already had a lot of brand supremacy matches with Kane, Orton, and Michaels.

In your previous post in this forum, you’ve been repeating words they’ve never met before. Well, if you look deep into history, before Taker’s WM matches — Taker and Michaels have met before, Taker and Edge have met before, Taker and Orton have met before, and if Taker and Cena are going to duck it out, even Taker and Cena have met many million times before (both as Big Evil and as The Dead Man gimmicks) before.

But the WWE often conceals the above facts, and they maintain that Taker vs Wrestler X haven’t met before, just to spice up the WM match. Most likely be it Cena or Jericho or Orton or Austin or Rock, WWE in most cases will keep the streak alive until Taker retires. So regardless of who the wrestler is he is going to lose against Taker in WM matches.

But how to spice things up? They must question the viewers minds on whether or not Taker will maintain his streak. Well that strongly depends on storyline part. If some Wrestler X is shown as a stronger opponent and is a threat for Taker’s streak, it is only the storyline that would breath life into that aspect and not the opponent on a whole.

Only in that regards, I am telling you that Jericho can be a better match as he has good storytelling abilities as well as good wrestling skills. Therefore Taker and Jericho can put up good storylines that will lead them to WM. Lot of emotions will soar between the two wrestlers because in addition to their fighting capabilities, they have excellent in-ring gimmicks. It is only in this regards I vote for a Taker/Jericho rivalry.

With regards to a Cena/Taker WM match, it will be good if, Taker turns heel and Cena as face. Only then Cena can atleast look like a threat to Taker’s streak.

Now we finally agree on something, friend.

Respectively speaking, none of the brand supremacy matches u mentioned above was a boring match, that’s why the anticipation is always big and people never got bored of it. And this is an indisputable fact.

And true, Cena is a title material, but his name is big enough that he can provide a draw without titles, much like Hogan, Rock, Bret, and Austin on their respective eras.

Bret vs Austin at WM 13 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.
Hogan vs Rock at WM 18 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.
HBK vs Taker at WM 25 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.

If Taker & Cena lose their titles by interference at Royal Rumble, they will be more than likely not participating in Elimination Chamber but instead taking down the perpetrators at the PPV.

And worry not bout the build up, those matches I mentioned above, especially Hogan vs Rock and HBK vs Taker got their proper build up after No Way Out, no? And both matches turned out to be legendary, right?

True, Jericho’s storytelling ability in the ring is amazing, no one can deny that fact. But Cena’s ability to get any kind of reaction no matter what it is from the crowds is on a class of its own. And no one can deny this fact either. He can connect from the fans no matter what. What he says, what he does, fans will buy it big time.

his is the first time that we’ve had a wrestler —-> fan connection since probably… Rock or SCSA. It’s almost like Allen Iverson with Philly fans, no matter what he does he’ll be loved by ALMOST everyone.

Some heels can’t even generate a boo from the crowd (Abraham Washington, despite the fact that he’s got some killer mic skills) And getting heel heat from a crowd is much easier than getting cheers from a crowd.

I think that Cena represents many things, for a lot of different people. There’s the little kids, who look up to him as a hero. He’s their real life superhero. And then there’s the moms who are happy that their kids are looking up to a guy like Cena. Then you have the fan girls, who scream and wail because of “how hot he is”. Then you’ve got your actual fans, the people who actually appreciate everything that he has done for WWE.

And there is one more thing that Cena got but Jericho not, Cena is introduced as an icon with his overcoming the odds attitude while Jericho isn’t. This mere fact makes John Cena a bigger threat for The Streak than Jericho.

I can’t argue that Jericho vs Taker will be the better quality match any day and anytime just like Taker vs Batista at WM 23 or Taker vs Edge at WM 24.

But no one can argue either that Cena vs Taker will be more legendary, simply because its two of the biggest names in this PG Era facing each other. Although Taker is always one of the biggest names in any era. It will be another icon vs icon. It’s going to be Hogan vs Andre in our time. And it’s a huge moneymaker for Vince. I’m sure the last statement is more than enough to guarantee this match will happen.

I can understand the differences between our view, and I apologize if my previous post somehow offended u. All in all, it’s a nice talk.

I’m waiting for a reply. (^^)

Friend,

I don’t see any difference between us. I am a Taker fan and so are you. You would love to see a Taker/Cena WM match and so am I. I could see that the way I was strong with my point of Taker/Jericho, you are with Taker/Cena. That actually never offended me. I only tried to substantiate my view points to you.

My predictions about a Taker/Jericho were based on the title scenario in both brands. If Taker/Cena match is for this year, I would be as happy as you would be as long as these two legends give their all.

Moreover, the WWE creative team can dish out something different this time, if they plan to do a Cena/Taker match. They can turn Taker heel and maintain Cena as face. Taker as a heel destroyer and Cena as a never say die attitude persona. This will really spice things up as Cena’s persona will surely sell as a potential threat for Taker’s Streak.

Otherwise they can do something which kinda sounds crazy. Nobody wins the battle royal, no number one contenders for the title at both brands until WM. As a result, Taker and Cena have a Championship vs Championship match. The build up for this match will surely be awesome as it something which is of the first of its kind in WM history.

Although the above idea is wierd it will be fun if it happens.

Alex wrote:

Mr. 0 wrote:

Alex wrote:

See,

I agree with all your points.

I am talking from WWE business’ perspective. I am not against Taker vs Cena. If WWE guys are planning on a Taker/Cena match, so be it. I am for it.

But logically speaking, Cena is a title material like The Rock or Austin. If Taker and Cena would duck it out, it would mostly be for the title. If Cena is to challenge Taker for the title @ WM 26, then he must switch brands or win the Rumble.

In my opinion switching brands is out of question, and there is only a little possibility when it comes to Cena winning the Rumble.

Speaking of Rumble, well a lot depends on the results of the Rumble. If Jericho is somehow involved in either winning the Rumble or interfering in Taker’s matches, then I am 100% sure that it’s going to be a Taker vs Jericho WM 26.

On the other hand, if either Cena or Taker or both lose the title, then the chances for a Cena/Taker rivlary is more.

Because, if both guys are going to drop the title, both will definitely attempt a rematch for the title again. Because, both guys are big guys, both are crowd favorites, and they will lose only through unfair means. This will lead to rematches, in the following PPV. When these two wrestlers take more PPV focussing on Rematches then they won’t have any time for a Taker/Cena build up.

These are the reasons why, I ve been sceptical about a Taker/Cena WM 26. Apart from that, Taker/Cena WM 26 will be fun only if it is for the title. If it is for some brand supremacy then it will look boring because Taker has already had a lot of brand supremacy matches with Kane, Orton, and Michaels.

In your previous post in this forum, you’ve been repeating words they’ve never met before. Well, if you look deep into history, before Taker’s WM matches — Taker and Michaels have met before, Taker and Edge have met before, Taker and Orton have met before, and if Taker and Cena are going to duck it out, even Taker and Cena have met many million times before (both as Big Evil and as The Dead Man gimmicks) before.

But the WWE often conceals the above facts, and they maintain that Taker vs Wrestler X haven’t met before, just to spice up the WM match. Most likely be it Cena or Jericho or Orton or Austin or Rock, WWE in most cases will keep the streak alive until Taker retires. So regardless of who the wrestler is he is going to lose against Taker in WM matches.

But how to spice things up? They must question the viewers minds on whether or not Taker will maintain his streak. Well that strongly depends on storyline part. If some Wrestler X is shown as a stronger opponent and is a threat for Taker’s streak, it is only the storyline that would breath life into that aspect and not the opponent on a whole.

Only in that regards, I am telling you that Jericho can be a better match as he has good storytelling abilities as well as good wrestling skills. Therefore Taker and Jericho can put up good storylines that will lead them to WM. Lot of emotions will soar between the two wrestlers because in addition to their fighting capabilities, they have excellent in-ring gimmicks. It is only in this regards I vote for a Taker/Jericho rivalry.

With regards to a Cena/Taker WM match, it will be good if, Taker turns heel and Cena as face. Only then Cena can atleast look like a threat to Taker’s streak.

Now we finally agree on something, friend.

Respectively speaking, none of the brand supremacy matches u mentioned above was a boring match, that’s why the anticipation is always big and people never got bored of it. And this is an indisputable fact.

And true, Cena is a title material, but his name is big enough that he can provide a draw without titles, much like Hogan, Rock, Bret, and Austin on their respective eras.

Bret vs Austin at WM 13 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.
Hogan vs Rock at WM 18 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.
HBK vs Taker at WM 25 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.

If Taker & Cena lose their titles by interference at Royal Rumble, they will be more than likely not participating in Elimination Chamber but instead taking down the perpetrators at the PPV.

And worry not bout the build up, those matches I mentioned above, especially Hogan vs Rock and HBK vs Taker got their proper build up after No Way Out, no? And both matches turned out to be legendary, right?

True, Jericho’s storytelling ability in the ring is amazing, no one can deny that fact. But Cena’s ability to get any kind of reaction no matter what it is from the crowds is on a class of its own. And no one can deny this fact either. He can connect from the fans no matter what. What he says, what he does, fans will buy it big time.

his is the first time that we’ve had a wrestler —-> fan connection since probably… Rock or SCSA. It’s almost like Allen Iverson with Philly fans, no matter what he does he’ll be loved by ALMOST everyone.

Some heels can’t even generate a boo from the crowd (Abraham Washington, despite the fact that he’s got some killer mic skills) And getting heel heat from a crowd is much easier than getting cheers from a crowd.

I think that Cena represents many things, for a lot of different people. There’s the little kids, who look up to him as a hero. He’s their real life superhero. And then there’s the moms who are happy that their kids are looking up to a guy like Cena. Then you have the fan girls, who scream and wail because of “how hot he is”. Then you’ve got your actual fans, the people who actually appreciate everything that he has done for WWE.

And there is one more thing that Cena got but Jericho not, Cena is introduced as an icon with his overcoming the odds attitude while Jericho isn’t. This mere fact makes John Cena a bigger threat for The Streak than Jericho.

I can’t argue that Jericho vs Taker will be the better quality match any day and anytime just like Taker vs Batista at WM 23 or Taker vs Edge at WM 24.

But no one can argue either that Cena vs Taker will be more legendary, simply because its two of the biggest names in this PG Era facing each other. Although Taker is always one of the biggest names in any era. It will be another icon vs icon. It’s going to be Hogan vs Andre in our time. And it’s a huge moneymaker for Vince. I’m sure the last statement is more than enough to guarantee this match will happen.

I can understand the differences between our view, and I apologize if my previous post somehow offended u. All in all, it’s a nice talk.

I’m waiting for a reply. (^^)

Friend,

I don’t see any difference between us. I am a Taker fan and so are you. You would love to see a Taker/Cena WM match and so am I. I could see that the way I was strong with my point of Taker/Jericho, you are with Taker/Cena. That actually never offended me. I only tried to substantiate my view points to you.

My predictions about a Taker/Jericho were based on the title scenario in both brands. If Taker/Cena match is for this year, I would be as happy as you would be as long as these two legends give their all.

Moreover, the WWE creative team can dish out something different this time, if they plan to do a Cena/Taker match. They can turn Taker heel and maintain Cena as face. Taker as a heel destroyer and Cena as a never say die attitude persona. This will really spice things up as Cena’s persona will surely sell as a potential threat for Taker’s Streak.

Otherwise they can do something which kinda sounds crazy. Nobody wins the battle royal, no number one contenders for the title at both brands until WM. As a result, Taker and Cena have a Championship vs Championship match. The build up for this match will surely be awesome as it something which is of the first of its kind in WM history.

Although the above idea is wierd it will be fun if it happens.

Great (^^), nice to see the reply. Perhaps u’re right after all, there’s no difference between us Taker fans. I might have exaggerated that part, and I’m sorry for it.

Thanks for the concern, explanation, and attention. If u post another blog, I’ll see to it.

BTW, I heard from many spoiler sites that WWE official insist on making Taker vs Cena at WM 26 as face vs face. Either way, I’m sure Taker’s going to be 18-0!

Ciao (^^)!!

Alex wrote:

Mr. 0 wrote:

Alex wrote:

See,

I agree with all your points.

I am talking from WWE business’ perspective. I am not against Taker vs Cena. If WWE guys are planning on a Taker/Cena match, so be it. I am for it.

But logically speaking, Cena is a title material like The Rock or Austin. If Taker and Cena would duck it out, it would mostly be for the title. If Cena is to challenge Taker for the title @ WM 26, then he must switch brands or win the Rumble.

In my opinion switching brands is out of question, and there is only a little possibility when it comes to Cena winning the Rumble.

Speaking of Rumble, well a lot depends on the results of the Rumble. If Jericho is somehow involved in either winning the Rumble or interfering in Taker’s matches, then I am 100% sure that it’s going to be a Taker vs Jericho WM 26.

On the other hand, if either Cena or Taker or both lose the title, then the chances for a Cena/Taker rivlary is more.

Because, if both guys are going to drop the title, both will definitely attempt a rematch for the title again. Because, both guys are big guys, both are crowd favorites, and they will lose only through unfair means. This will lead to rematches, in the following PPV. When these two wrestlers take more PPV focussing on Rematches then they won’t have any time for a Taker/Cena build up.

These are the reasons why, I ve been sceptical about a Taker/Cena WM 26. Apart from that, Taker/Cena WM 26 will be fun only if it is for the title. If it is for some brand supremacy then it will look boring because Taker has already had a lot of brand supremacy matches with Kane, Orton, and Michaels.

In your previous post in this forum, you’ve been repeating words they’ve never met before. Well, if you look deep into history, before Taker’s WM matches — Taker and Michaels have met before, Taker and Edge have met before, Taker and Orton have met before, and if Taker and Cena are going to duck it out, even Taker and Cena have met many million times before (both as Big Evil and as The Dead Man gimmicks) before.

But the WWE often conceals the above facts, and they maintain that Taker vs Wrestler X haven’t met before, just to spice up the WM match. Most likely be it Cena or Jericho or Orton or Austin or Rock, WWE in most cases will keep the streak alive until Taker retires. So regardless of who the wrestler is he is going to lose against Taker in WM matches.

But how to spice things up? They must question the viewers minds on whether or not Taker will maintain his streak. Well that strongly depends on storyline part. If some Wrestler X is shown as a stronger opponent and is a threat for Taker’s streak, it is only the storyline that would breath life into that aspect and not the opponent on a whole.

Only in that regards, I am telling you that Jericho can be a better match as he has good storytelling abilities as well as good wrestling skills. Therefore Taker and Jericho can put up good storylines that will lead them to WM. Lot of emotions will soar between the two wrestlers because in addition to their fighting capabilities, they have excellent in-ring gimmicks. It is only in this regards I vote for a Taker/Jericho rivalry.

With regards to a Cena/Taker WM match, it will be good if, Taker turns heel and Cena as face. Only then Cena can atleast look like a threat to Taker’s streak.

Now we finally agree on something, friend.

Respectively speaking, none of the brand supremacy matches u mentioned above was a boring match, that’s why the anticipation is always big and people never got bored of it. And this is an indisputable fact.

And true, Cena is a title material, but his name is big enough that he can provide a draw without titles, much like Hogan, Rock, Bret, and Austin on their respective eras.

Bret vs Austin at WM 13 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.
Hogan vs Rock at WM 18 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.
HBK vs Taker at WM 25 wasn’t for a title, but we knew how that match turned out.

If Taker & Cena lose their titles by interference at Royal Rumble, they will be more than likely not participating in Elimination Chamber but instead taking down the perpetrators at the PPV.

And worry not bout the build up, those matches I mentioned above, especially Hogan vs Rock and HBK vs Taker got their proper build up after No Way Out, no? And both matches turned out to be legendary, right?

True, Jericho’s storytelling ability in the ring is amazing, no one can deny that fact. But Cena’s ability to get any kind of reaction no matter what it is from the crowds is on a class of its own. And no one can deny this fact either. He can connect from the fans no matter what. What he says, what he does, fans will buy it big time.

his is the first time that we’ve had a wrestler —-> fan connection since probably… Rock or SCSA. It’s almost like Allen Iverson with Philly fans, no matter what he does he’ll be loved by ALMOST everyone.

Some heels can’t even generate a boo from the crowd (Abraham Washington, despite the fact that he’s got some killer mic skills) And getting heel heat from a crowd is much easier than getting cheers from a crowd.

I think that Cena represents many things, for a lot of different people. There’s the little kids, who look up to him as a hero. He’s their real life superhero. And then there’s the moms who are happy that their kids are looking up to a guy like Cena. Then you have the fan girls, who scream and wail because of “how hot he is”. Then you’ve got your actual fans, the people who actually appreciate everything that he has done for WWE.

And there is one more thing that Cena got but Jericho not, Cena is introduced as an icon with his overcoming the odds attitude while Jericho isn’t. This mere fact makes John Cena a bigger threat for The Streak than Jericho.

I can’t argue that Jericho vs Taker will be the better quality match any day and anytime just like Taker vs Batista at WM 23 or Taker vs Edge at WM 24.

But no one can argue either that Cena vs Taker will be more legendary, simply because its two of the biggest names in this PG Era facing each other. Although Taker is always one of the biggest names in any era. It will be another icon vs icon. It’s going to be Hogan vs Andre in our time. And it’s a huge moneymaker for Vince. I’m sure the last statement is more than enough to guarantee this match will happen.

I can understand the differences between our view, and I apologize if my previous post somehow offended u. All in all, it’s a nice talk.

I’m waiting for a reply. (^^)

Friend,

I don’t see any difference between us. I am a Taker fan and so are you. You would love to see a Taker/Cena WM match and so am I. I could see that the way I was strong with my point of Taker/Jericho, you are with Taker/Cena. That actually never offended me. I only tried to substantiate my view points to you.

My predictions about a Taker/Jericho were based on the title scenario in both brands. If Taker/Cena match is for this year, I would be as happy as you would be as long as these two legends give their all.

Moreover, the WWE creative team can dish out something different this time, if they plan to do a Cena/Taker match. They can turn Taker heel and maintain Cena as face. Taker as a heel destroyer and Cena as a never say die attitude persona. This will really spice things up as Cena’s persona will surely sell as a potential threat for Taker’s Streak.

Otherwise they can do something which kinda sounds crazy. Nobody wins the battle royal, no number one contenders for the title at both brands until WM. As a result, Taker and Cena have a Championship vs Championship match. The build up for this match will surely be awesome as it something which is of the first of its kind in WM history.

Although the above idea is wierd it will be fun if it happens.

then it all make sense wwe will go back to wwf with only one single heavyweight championship titles will be unified and will go with the winner of tht TITLE VS TITLE match

@Alex and Mr.O: Guyz i am turning into a mad person right now it’s kinda a difficult to predict the outcome that who might face Undertaker at Wrestlemania 26 ! I think we should wait till Royal rumble approaches or after the royal rumble to finally predict what’s gonna go down at wm26 but i think it’s very difficult to predict cena vs taker match that how wwe will make it happen as they both are on different brands as you all know umaga died at so young age so know one can predict the future as fpr taker health is concerned he is said to fading a bit every time he is on the scene so personally i think this is the most suitable Wrestlemania for taker to face cena as no one know’s what’s is store for us next year ! As for my comments are concerned i just want to apoligize if i said something wrong or bad to you both as i am also a big taker fan.
This is off topic but still i am telling you both that if someone asks me who’s your top 3 favorite wrestlers of all time, i always say 1. taker 2. taker n taker .. anywayz its’s been a good conversation and hoping to have this more in the future …take care u both.

i think there could be a rey mystereo interference when batista has the match one and than undertaker could hold the title and than defend it a wm26

Taker should retain the title against Batista at the TLC & Rumble and have Cena lose his and win the Rumble match. Then Cena could choose to face Taker at Wrestlemania for his WHC.

Or then Jericho should win the Rumble and challenge Taker, because Cena has already won it before. Then Cena would propably face Batista at Mania.

Someone mentioned that Vince had been planning something for Undertaker as we have seen in smackdown previously!!! i think so too..i think we r gonna get a Screwjob for Taker again as i dont see him as the champ by Wrestlemania..as we know by now, besides Sid, Undertaker always went to Wrestlemania to prove something and bury people…so it has to be someone who Undertaker has to prove that he is the phenom..so its either Jericho which i doubt, or most likely thanks to Vince; The rock…yes I see Undertaker vs Rock for a special match and Vionce being involved in it!! i see taker losing the title by EC!!…and Batista sucks, he cant wrestle sorry…But Taker should be champ until next year, that because his character is indestructible therefore she should be unbeaten…if u consider cena and even jbl had very long title reigns where both of them suck as wrestler, then we definetly expect to see Taker as a Champ for at least 18 months deservedly so!!!

and if they are trying to let Taker heal his injuries, why are they putting him against the careless animal who is on a rage in TLC match?? makes sense?? and if thats the case, we all KNOW FOR SURE< Undertaker will get his revenge on batista anytime sooon cause he doesnt not forgive or forget!! so making Batista beat taker and take the title makes no sense since Taker will beat him the next time for sure!! WWE needs people like us in here to write stories, their creative team must be potheads!!!

why is there’s always injury problems with taker?…whenever he get the title, then suddenly, things bout injuries and he’s dropping the title soon. Is he that fragile??? do u guys ever wonder why that is? even now, when he first got the title, it doesn’t took till 24hour before the story bout his injuries suddenly all over the net. But when cena or batista or randy orton got the title, there’s no shit bout any injuries.

DjMetro wrote:

Someone mentioned that Vince had been planning something for Undertaker as we have seen in smackdown previously!!! i think so too..i think we r gonna get a Screwjob for Taker again as i dont see him as the champ by Wrestlemania..as we know by now, besides Sid, Undertaker always went to Wrestlemania to prove something and bury people…so it has to be someone who Undertaker has to prove that he is the phenom..so its either Jericho which i doubt, or most likely thanks to Vince; The rock…yes I see Undertaker vs Rock for a special match and Vionce being involved in it!! i see taker losing the title by EC!!…and Batista sucks, he cant wrestle sorry…But Taker should be champ until next year, that because his character is indestructible therefore she should be unbeaten…if u consider cena and even jbl had very long title reigns where both of them suck as wrestler, then we definetly expect to see Taker as a Champ for at least 18 months deservedly so!!!

Not gonna happen. Rock’s done with wrestling. About the title reign…one can only wonder.

DjMetro wrote:

and if they are trying to let Taker heal his injuries, why are they putting him against the careless animal who is on a rage in TLC match?? makes sense?? and if thats the case, we all KNOW FOR SURE< Undertaker will get his revenge on batista anytime sooon cause he doesnt not forgive or forget!! so making Batista beat taker and take the title makes no sense since Taker will beat him the next time for sure!! WWE needs people like us in here to write stories, their creative team must be potheads!!!

Cause there is no other worthy main eventer than Batista. This is also the best way to sell Batista as a heel (at least in Vince’s eyes).

galasura wrote:

why is there’s always injury problems with taker?…whenever he get the title, then suddenly, things bout injuries and he’s dropping the title soon. Is he that fragile??? do u guys ever wonder why that is? even now, when he first got the title, it doesn’t took till 24hour before the story bout his injuries suddenly all over the net. But when cena or batista or randy orton got the title, there’s no shit bout any injuries.

Maybe cause Taker is near retirement whereas the three you mentioned aren’t.

Saad wrote:

@Alex and Mr.O: Guyz i am turning into a mad person right now it’s kinda a difficult to predict the outcome that who might face Undertaker at Wrestlemania 26 ! I think we should wait till Royal rumble approaches or after the royal rumble to finally predict what’s gonna go down at wm26 but i think it’s very difficult to predict cena vs taker match that how wwe will make it happen as they both are on different brands as you all know umaga died at so young age so know one can predict the future as fpr taker health is concerned he is said to fading a bit every time he is on the scene so personally i think this is the most suitable Wrestlemania for taker to face cena as no one know’s what’s is store for us next year ! As for my comments are concerned i just want to apoligize if i said something wrong or bad to you both as i am also a big taker fan.
This is off topic but still i am telling you both that if someone asks me who’s your top 3 favorite wrestlers of all time, i always say 1. taker 2. taker n taker .. anywayz its’s been a good conversation and hoping to have this more in the future …take care u both.

You’re welcome. And u too, take care!!

- Towards the end of the WWE RAW live show last night in Dublin, Ireland, the lights went out and The Undertaker’s bell went off. WWE ring announcer Tony Chimel then announced that WWE’s tour of Europe next April in 2010 would be a part of The Undertaker’s retirement.

SO DON,T EVER CALL ME A LIAR AGAIN,GET YOU FACTS STRAIGHT IF YOU WANNA CALL SOMEBODY A LIAR

Saad wrote:

@Alex and Mr.O: Guyz i am turning into a mad person right now it’s kinda a difficult to predict the outcome that who might face Undertaker at Wrestlemania 26 ! I think we should wait till Royal rumble approaches or after the royal rumble to finally predict what’s gonna go down at wm26 but i think it’s very difficult to predict cena vs taker match that how wwe will make it happen as they both are on different brands as you all know umaga died at so young age so know one can predict the future as fpr taker health is concerned he is said to fading a bit every time he is on the scene so personally i think this is the most suitable Wrestlemania for taker to face cena as no one know’s what’s is store for us next year ! As for my comments are concerned i just want to apoligize if i said something wrong or bad to you both as i am also a big taker fan.
This is off topic but still i am telling you both that if someone asks me who’s your top 3 favorite wrestlers of all time, i always say 1. taker 2. taker n taker .. anywayz its’s been a good conversation and hoping to have this more in the future …take care u both.

Saad,

I only see this as a healthy discussion. There is nothing wrong or bad. We all are Taker fans, and I am so happy that there are die hard Taker fans like Mr.O and You.

Quite honestly, before I got to knew this website, I thought Taker had no fans. Believe me, I mean it. Because, Taker has done no movies, Taker has never had the championship like other wrestlers, Taker never comes in video packages related to wrestling, or Taker never addresses fans like other wrestlers do. So I was of the impression that Taker had no fans, and I was the only one. But only after visiting this website I came to know about so many Taker fans.

Yes, we argue, but what for we argue. We argue for Taker’s wellness, both on and off ring. So this is kind of healthy discussion, and this is how it has got to be. How come I am able to write such a blog? It is due to some inputs given by members of this very forum. If I could come up with something like this, certainly based on my view points people like you can come up with something better, and this way the knowledge chain continues.

Mr.O argued about why Taker/Cena is better than Taker/Jericho. I agree with him. Even if, WWE plans on a Taker/Jericho WM for real, who knows, one of the creative guys might have looked at our discussion and might have changed their mind to a Taker/Cena WM. That is what a collective communication medium such as forums and blogs could do to the world, which is to come up with better ideas. So Saad, you are always welcome, friend.

deadman wrote:

- Towards the end of the WWE RAW live show last night in Dublin, Ireland, the lights went out and The Undertaker’s bell went off. WWE ring announcer Tony Chimel then announced that WWE’s tour of Europe next April in 2010 would be a part of The Undertaker’s retirement.

SO DON,T EVER CALL ME A LIAR AGAIN,GET YOU FACTS STRAIGHT IF YOU WANNA CALL SOMEBODY A LIAR

If that is the case so be it. I hope the WWE guys don’t fiddle with his streak.

If the WWE still intends to follow that stupid rule “loose before you leave” policy, then let it happen in Survivor Series 2010.

Before I answer this I have one question…how to write a blog on here? I have no clue?

Trindle wrote:

Before I answer this I have one question…how to write a blog on here? I have no clue?

http://www.phenomforever.com/?page_id=5225 :)

@Alex & Mr.O: Thanks a lot Guyz ! Anyways, i need a favor from you both can you give me your email addresses i wanna share something … as i used to make so much videos related to wrestling and ppv’s prediction and i also upload videos on youtube so i thought i might share this with you both as i need fans who are interested in wrestling and most important they are taker fans. As i also need more more friends so i can share my things.

Saad,

I don’t mind giving you my E-Mail address, but I am not sure whether it is a recommended practice in this forum to exchange contact details.

Only the key people moderating this forum should let me know whether is exchanging contact information in this forum is accepted or not.

As I always go by the rules this is purely a moderator’s call and only they should guide us on this.

deadman wrote:

- Towards the end of the WWE RAW live show last night in Dublin, Ireland, the lights went out and The Undertaker’s bell went off. WWE ring announcer Tony Chimel then announced that WWE’s tour of Europe next April in 2010 would be a part of The Undertaker’s retirement.

SO DON,T EVER CALL ME A LIAR AGAIN,GET YOU FACTS STRAIGHT IF YOU WANNA CALL SOMEBODY A LIAR

If that’s the case, then I will be sad and no longer watch WWE… and also be extremely glad I went to the smackdown taping in rochester ny a few weeks ago and got to see the dead man in person and as champion no less even though it was a dark main event match where he squashed cm punk.

If that’s the case, then I think Taker will hold the title until WM and successfully defend the title at WM before retiring and that would also explain why they gave him the title so quickly after he came back from injury. One last tour as champ.

I reckon that this is taker long title run otherwise they would have not giving him the championship
or would have made lose it at bragging rights or ss cos I rekon said to Vince that wants a long championship run. I also rekon taker will face cena at wm they both will still be champion the match will be which champion is better

Saad wrote:

@Alex & Mr.O: Thanks a lot Guyz ! Anyways, i need a favor from you both can you give me your email addresses i wanna share something … as i used to make so much videos related to wrestling and ppv’s prediction and i also upload videos on youtube so i thought i might share this with you both as i need fans who are interested in wrestling and most important they are taker fans. As i also need more more friends so i can share my things.

Alex wrote:

Saad,

I don’t mind giving you my E-Mail address, but I am not sure whether it is a recommended practice in this forum to exchange contact details.

Only the key people moderating this forum should let me know whether is exchanging contact information in this forum is accepted or not.

As I always go by the rules this is purely a moderator’s call and only they should guide us on this.

I can’t agree more.

Dan wrote:

I reckon that this is taker long title run otherwise they would have not giving him the championship
or would have made lose it at bragging rights or ss cos I rekon said to Vince that wants a long championship run. I also rekon taker will face cena at wm they both will still be champion the match will be which champion is better

If only this were true, what a beautiful world we live in.

i have to say, that this post is full of lies and speculations….remember the undertaker and jericho had already fight 3 times in the last month……it’s too soon to talk about who’s the undertaker is gonna face at wrestlemania, i just don’t get it….. the only kinda rumor started at raw few weeks ago…when taker gave the tombstone to cena, the posible fight between taker and cena at mania with both holding titles…it’s time to bring back…..the good old Wwe Undisputed title.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0a0fELiqFk

There are a lot of uninformed ignormus’s commenting on this horrible blog here. First and foremost, The Undertaker is not going to lose the Title anytime soon, especially to Batista, Undertaker is getting the crap beat out of him the last couple of weeks, and do you think that the same thing is going to happen at TLC? This goes against the very fiber of the Dark Persona of the Undertaker Character. If he were to lose that Title this way then this is the worst possible way to treat the Undertaker beings as this is his 20th year in the WWE, Since he has become champion he has not looked dominant in any matches, he has had the 3 way, 4 way, etc, Undertaker does not need to job for BATISTA. If Undertaker loses his title to Batista in a huge beatdown, there will be hell to pay for the WWE by its fans for the poor treatment of the Undetaker. Vince McMahon is not a stupid person and will not screw the DEADMAN like this. The only one on this blog that got it right was DJMESTRO The Undertaker’s WM Opponent will be THE ROCK, The Rock has not retired, The Rock is coming back to a Part time/fulltime role, he has a deal in the works with McMahon, I will take it one step further, and state that McMahon and The Rock are in Kahoots with eachother, Wrestlemania will be a 3 way match for the Unification of the Titles, The Rock, Cena, and The Undertaker, the Rock will screw Cena to Allow Undertaker to win , setting up Next 2011 WM between Cena and Undertaker. The New Ministry will begin, and at Some poiint McMahon and the Rock will screw the Undertaker leaving the final WM for the DEADMAN, Undertaker v MCMAHON with the Rock by MCMahon’s side. The Rock will win the Rumble, it all makes sense from a business perspective, In the Real World Cena and The Rock hate eachother, or at least Cena hates the Rock, This is the Money Maker Match, neither has beaten the Undertaker, everyone invovled has issues with eachother.

i agree with that perspective, saying that Undertakers LAST WRESTLEMANIA victim will be none other Vince Mcmahon!!! conme on guys, think about it its only fittting to finish Wrestlemania career by beating the most important and the most powerful of all Mcmahon!!! since he created the character as well, i see him as the victim 19 or 20 i hope!!! and yes i do see Rock vs Taker somehow and Taker vs Cena maybe next year at WM and someone mention that 2010 is takers retirement tour? i dont think so, even though it would make sense since its his 20th year from now on till nest SSeries!!1 but i see him wrestle 2 more years…he is in a ok shape and i know he still want to give more for this business and his COTN!!!!!!

The Undertaker will be in the Money in the Bank match at WM 26 for sure.

And win it.

phuk dong wrote:

There are a lot of uninformed ignormus’s commenting on this horrible blog here. First and foremost, The Undertaker is not going to lose the Title anytime soon, especially to Batista, Undertaker is getting the crap beat out of him the last couple of weeks, and do you think that the same thing is going to happen at TLC? This goes against the very fiber of the Dark Persona of the Undertaker Character. If he were to lose that Title this way then this is the worst possible way to treat the Undertaker beings as this is his 20th year in the WWE, Since he has become champion he has not looked dominant in any matches, he has had the 3 way, 4 way, etc, Undertaker does not need to job for BATISTA. If Undertaker loses his title to Batista in a huge beatdown, there will be hell to pay for the WWE by its fans for the poor treatment of the Undetaker. Vince McMahon is not a stupid person and will not screw the DEADMAN like this. The only one on this blog that got it right was DJMESTRO The Undertaker’s WM Opponent will be THE ROCK, The Rock has not retired, The Rock is coming back to a Part time/fulltime role, he has a deal in the works with McMahon, I will take it one step further, and state that McMahon and The Rock are in Kahoots with eachother, Wrestlemania will be a 3 way match for the Unification of the Titles, The Rock, Cena, and The Undertaker, the Rock will screw Cena to Allow Undertaker to win , setting up Next 2011 WM between Cena and Undertaker. The New Ministry will begin, and at Some poiint McMahon and the Rock will screw the Undertaker leaving the final WM for the DEADMAN, Undertaker v MCMAHON with the Rock by MCMahon’s side. The Rock will win the Rumble, it all makes sense from a business perspective, In the Real World Cena and The Rock hate eachother, or at least Cena hates the Rock, This is the Money Maker Match, neither has beaten the Undertaker, everyone invovled has issues with eachother.

Ridiculous. The Rock? Yeah, right. And Shawn Michaels is a 20 time world champion.

phuk dong wrote:

There are a lot of uninformed ignormus’s commenting on this horrible blog here. .

Lol, some people make me laugh with the idiotic comments, and then there is you. So I’ll just do what a skeptical reader would do. Where’s the proof to back your statements up?

If deadman lost the title to Batista at the Royal rumble what was the point in giving him the title in the first place that aint a long run if they are serious bout him having a lengthy run id look at him dropping the title at the bash or night of champions. he has earnt such a lengthy run. Batista as a heel has not done enough yet to get the title give it time like they did with Edge just not that long let him have a shoot at it again later next year with a different champion. i was hopng deadman and Jericho at mania for the title that would be juicy. id like to see if he is not still injured Edge vs Batista at mania that be juicy to with there history with roles switched Edge baby face Batista heel.

Am I able to use this a number of times a day to see faster results?