‘Taker vs. Jericho For WrestleMania 26?
There has been some preliminary talk about having the Undertaker wrestle Chris Jericho at WrestleMania. Original plans were for Undertaker to wrestle Vince McMahon and Chris Jericho to wrestle Edge, but with Edge’s health status up in the air, Undertaker-Jericho is now being considered.
57 Comments
Leave a Reply
Comment Guidelines- Do not post with the primary intent of disrupting normal on-topic discussion
- Do not double post, edit your previous comment
- SmackDown spoilers should only be discussed in the SmackDown Spoilers news topics
- When quoting comments only keep the part of the text you are replying to
- To add an avatar next to your comment visit Gravatar.com
Loading ...
Edge has already been on the Wrestlemania Taker list,Kane has been on it twice to,WWE needs to change things,and shake things up again,addding Jericho to the list would be awesome ;-)
But i have a feeling Jericho might be the one..
Ah ha, so it potentially confirms that we know Vince and Taker are/were/or possibly going to feud.
Jack wrote:
It wasn’t referring to Edge facing Taker again it was Edge facing Jericho. I’m just clarifying in case you misunderstood.
Oh right thanks for letting me know,missed read it lol,but either way it would still be awesome this Jericho/Taker feud,after Ten years,we finally get to see this!.
why would jericho be the one to end the streak. he already has history to his career, plus he beat orton edge batista hhh& hbk so if they couldndt why should jericho.the real plan 4 da streak is jericho cena mcmahon 2 become 20-0 &retire but dont tell everyone or wwe will find out and cancel that plan.(or did i just make that up!)
I like cake, whats that thing there. R Thoughs my feet
this match would be good…jericho v taker
I believe Jericho to be Taker’s 18th victim at Wrestlemania! Jericho, at Survivor Series and at Wrestlemania 26 you will Rest in Peace!
Taker will Hopefully still champion and face Chris for the belt and become 18-0 at wrestlemania
I don’t believe that WWE actually considered Taker vs Vince, maybe they wanted to create a feud between VKM and Taker in which Vince would choose Taker’s opponent offering a big reward if that person ends the streak; then maybe Vince could be at ringside during the match helping the heel and when Taker wins, Vince eats a Tombstone ending the feud.
Oh another thing, don’t trust “news sites” or “dirty sheets”. Nobody knows when Edge is coming back but Vince, remember Cena showing up at the RR he won? Taker attacking Punk at Summerslam? Christian showing up at ECW? WWE leaks bogus news so the almighty self proclaimed know it all’s of backstage news put them on their sites misleading fans so they can work in a surprise return. At this point Edge could be missing another six months or maybe he could show up at NWO, he could even challenge Jericho in SD! or RAW in february.
Jericho/Taker should be fun, but Y2J needs to defeat serious contenders in one on one matches and prove he can take on the deadman by himself. I mean, you can’t defeat Taker if you lose cleanly to Kofi and Rey. A win over jobber Kane these days is as good as defeating Funaki.
I’d love to see them face Jericho, but I’d also like to see him face Cena, but McMahon? How would that happen? He’s 64! And so they’ve already done, McMahon sends a representitive. And so far the two have yet to cross paths in since he wen tHybrid as far as I can remember…
I hope they don’t pull a WM25 (Shawn/Taker outdid the champion matches.) Because it makes everyone look bad. It’s like putting Taker at the top of the card, it doesn’t work real well. You all saw how bad Hell in a Cell was.
Hombre Muerto wrote:
Cena’s return at the Royal Rumble was definatly a shocker. There wasn’t any rumors about that, unlike when Christian returned. Everyone knew he was going to return it was just when and where was what nobody knew. Big Shows’s 2008 return was a shocker as it was never actually known if he was going to come back. And Taker’s return at SummerSlam was also predictable after the reports indicated Jeff Hardy was leaving and WWE scrappped all current plans for Taker’s return.
Taker’s return’s this year was “shocking” in the sense WWE did not hype the return as they usually did. But as far as his return went, it was known he was going to show up during or the week after Jeff left the company. What would be a real shocker is if Edge returns within the next month. I still feel they’ll hold his return out until closer to Wrestlemania.
I don’t care who Undertaker faces at WrestleMania, I just wanna see him walk out of it with the streak intact…
John wrote:
You said it best.
18-0
John wrote:
So, basically u don’t care if Taker faces Ziggler? Weird…
Trindle wrote:
In terms of Cenas return at the RR, alot of the superstars didnt know he was going to come back at that time. In one of the WWE mags with a Cena interview, he said that he was let in the arena and hung out in a closed off room to stretch and all. Then a minute or so before the 30th entrant was going to come out, he came out and went to the ring. The only people that knew were the ones he saw on the way to the entrance area. According to WWE mag.
But back on topic of Taker vs Jericho.
This match will be epic, cant wait to see them go at it on SD this week.
I doubt if this news is true because I can’t believe it that they wanted to do Taker vs Vince. It would be a horrible match to say the least, because Vince can’t last against Taker for even 30 seconds. Interference and other things will only make the match worse. After the 3 classics which Taker has given at the last 3 Manias, it would be terrible booking on the WWE’s part to put him in a match against Vince.
Although, I do think that Taker vs Jericho is more than a probability and the chances of that happening are the highest.
Uh mayank, hbk and vince made a good match at wm 22. So i think Taker and vince can also make a good match.
Hombre Muerto wrote:
I agree with you.
vince vs taker could happen..But the storyline should be really thought out..then the interference is not a big deal and vince could have a shit load of people who could interfere…all is possible in WWE
We still got while to WM but its possible.
Wonder why Vince wants to put himself into this. To make everyone believe that “yeah, the chairman will definitely find a way to end the streak through hook or by crook” and then everybody will once again start predicting that Taker’s streak will end? We all know eventually it won’t, so why not give good matches while we’re at it :-)
Tom wrote:
I doubt this. Its obvious that the WWE won’t put it on their own mag that everyone knew that Cena was returning. But my point is – the superstars who were in the ring HAD to know who is going to win the Rumble. That is how the eliminations have to be pre-decided, otherwise how will they know who are supposed to be the last few men remaining and how will they decide on whom the winner will eliminate last (and how will he do it) to win it. It is possible that a lot of other non-executive staff of the WWE might not be knowing this, perhaps because the WWE wanted to keep Cena’s return a top secret so that even spoiler websites and reporters don’t come to know of it. That is why nobody was able to predict it. But one thing for certain is that the referees, the commentators and the wrestlers involved in the match had to know that Cena is planned to win the Rumble. They usually always know it – if you saw the end of the 2005 Rumble which Batista had won (in which Batista and Cena were the last 2 men), you’ll know what I mean.
chris jericho is not the big thing for the undertaker. undertaker had beaten even more challenger and toughest opponents at wrestlemania. 18-0
Taker vs. Jericho probley go on & don’t count off Vince. why simple Vince could be refree or out side interfearence. So Vince i think well be differently still part of it. Yea Vince taking on Taker he can’t hang withn Taker but as Ref or extra person on the side. Actually Why wasn’t Cena brought on more to or should say they should thiink morw about Cena then jericho. but whatever…
Mayank Shridhar wrote:
Maybe he’ll have a squash match like the Kane/Chavo and Rey/JBL matches that Wrestlemaia is infamous for. lol
Seriously, I heard Taker will apear at WM after he retires. Maybe McMahon will screw somthing up involving Taker one day after he retires and they’ll have a ‘match’. Taker Tombstones him and The Streak goes on even though the Deadman was retired. lol
All for Jericho, I just hope thry can fill the time in between now and then, they are already in a match friday.
noooooooooooooooooooooooo not chris jerico vs undertaker i want john cena vs undertaker
In my opinion it will not be somebody he has feuded with in 2009. If they had save this for WrestleMania I would’ve thought about Y2J. I am more convince it will be the Hulk Hogan of this decade meaning JOHN CENA against the Andre the Giant of the WWE obviously The Phenom UNDERTAKER. My opinion take it for what it’s worth.
Yessss….hopefully that happens the ’so-long awaited’ match …
Jericho has been pushing it on the previous SD…and mocking Taker not being a “dead”-man…..
well…let’s see how they build it towards WM….
Although i have the feeling also that …somehow…Vince mite put in some of his to “interfere”….Drew McIntyre~~~ that guy said something abt wanting the WHC….hmm a “new” RR winner???
TAkergurl wrote:
There’s no way Drew would win his first royal rumble, he is no Lesnar. And I doubt Vince would put something to interfere. To raise the quality of Wrestlemania matches, he usually prefers no interference, even in his onw match (like against HBK at WM 22). Jericho is a great heel, but he rarely uses dirty tactics to win. Even Vickie interrupted the storyline between Edge and Taker after Wrestlemania 24 is over, right?
I think we will see a clean match (Taker wins of course).
BTW, I’ve heard from Y/A! that Taker vs Jericho at WM 26 would be a gimmick match because they face in a singles match this friday. And the gimmick match would be between a Last Ride Match and a Last Man Standing Match.
Among those two matches, which one do u prefer to have?
Personally, I don’t mind seeing any of those matches. but if I would have to choose, I’ll go with Last Man Standing. Because with the right booking, we can see the first 5 star match after thirteen long years.
Great!!! I only hope it will be for the WHC it will be great.
To whoever that said Taker can’t carry opponents like HBK can – that’s cr*p. HBK can’t make good matches out of the big fat giants like Khali or Henry or Big SLow but if you look at the way Taker carries them, he is the only one who can make them look worthwhile in the ring. Taker’s last man standing match against Khali on Smackdown was pretty decent. If it was against HBK, he wouldn’t have lasted more than 2 minutes in the ring. Taker is able to carry both, the big guys as well as the small guys, and he is the only one who can do all sorts of gimmick matches with them as well. Take Kane vs Khali for example – that match sucked. But Taker vs Kane at Mania 14 rocked, and so did their first infero match. Taker knows how to get the best out of every opponent, no matter how bad they are. But if you’re comparing it to HBK vs Angle or HBK vs Shelton, well, Angle and Shelton are much better wrestlers than Kane or Khali. Look at how big stars Taker made in Mankind and Kane. I’m not denying that HBK carries his opponents well, I’m just saying that you can’t say he does it better than Taker because Taker knows how to carry the “bad-wrestlers” too.
Mayank Shridhar wrote:
I’m sorry, I didn’t mean bad. I know Taker can carry his opponents pretty well, but it is a well known fact that HBK does it slightly better. In terms of carrying opponents, Taker and HBK are pretty much equal, though.
Yes, HBK’s weakness is he can’t wrestle well against fat giants. But when it comes to small-330lbs superstar, hbk does it best. Hbk is slightly better than taker about that. But i wonder why Taker’s match with big bossman and ken shamrock were very boring though.
About wm 26: i still prefer cena as taker’s opponent though.
bossybos wrote:
It can’t be a known fact, it has to be only your own opinion. Name one bad wrestler (of the quality of Kane or Khali or Kamala) whom HBK carried well? Yes, he doesn’t have the size for it, but then Taker doesn’t let his size be a factor to stop him. He carries big and small guys equally well.
Icang wrote:
I think it will hurt Cena’s image as top-face of Raw. That is why Stone Cold and Rock also never faced Taker at Mania. BTW, while the Taker vs Cena match might be bigger, I still think Jericho will give a better match with Taker than Cena would simply due to wrestling-ability.
Um, Cena won’t face Taker at Wrestlemania 26. Taker will be more than likely to face Jericho.
Mayank Shridhar wrote:
I think if Taker can make it to Wrestlemania 27 at 2011, he will definitely face Cena for some reasons:
1. There’s no big name left for Taker to fight. Who do u want Taker to fight at WM 27? Morrison? Punk? Ziggler? Ted Jr? Bourne? Swagger? I’m sorry for saying this, but none of those names would be beliavable enough to end The Streak by Wrestlemania 27, regardless of the push they get. And since Vince has learned from the mistake by putting Undertaker against Mark Henry at Wrestlemania 22, let’s not add Kozlov, Jackson, and Sheamus to the list. And i think it would be weird if after getting Batista, Edge, Shawn Michaels, and Chris Jericho, Taker suddenly got mid-carders. Even before he got Mark Henry, Taker got to face Triple H, Ric Flair, Big Show, Kane, and Orton, right?
2. Cena has been pinned by Orton before at Wrestlemania 24 and it didn’t hurt his credibility as the face of RAW at all. Besides, why did WWE let ORTON pinned Cena but not THE UNDERTAKER?
3. It would be the modern era Hogan vs Andre, and undeniably Vince will make millions of cash just by promoting the match, especially with the possibility of Cena ending The Streak. All the attention, hype, promo, hope, and anxiety would be insane….and needless to say, makes millions. Vince loves money, doesn’t he?
@mayank shridhar: kane is a bad wrestler? Today, yes. Kane doesn’t do any athletic moves again and he’s getting slow. Back then when kane was masked, kane did almost all taker could do (except good submission moves)
And i disagree with you about cena loses his credibility if he loses to taker at wrestlemania. At 2008, cena was pinned by orton at wm 24. Did cena lost his credibility? No. At night of champions 2008, cena was pinned by triple h. Did cena lost his credibility? No. At the bash, cena lost to jbl. Did cena lost his credibility? No. At sslam, batista broke cena’s neck and cena was pinned again. Did cena lost his credibility? No.
And just like you said mayank, batista, edge and orton benefited from the lost to taker at wrestlemania. I think cena will gain benefits from losing to taker at wrestlemania.
Sorry if my words are too offensive.
Sorry Mayank but i think i am going to have to side with the others on this one, i dont see how ANYONES rep can be tarnished by losing to Taker, especially at WM. having said that i’d still prefer jericho, although Cena creates more hype Jericho is the better wrestler and would make for a good match.
Icang wrote:
Actually John Cena broke his own neck, just like he tore his own pectoral muscle. Cena has the tendency to be careless with what he does, but he still gets the title put on him on his first night back from injury anyway.
Cena broke his own neck? Lol, that’s funny to hear. But i was very happy when batista beat cena.
Ok, now back to the topic: maybe jericho will win the rumble or win the elimination chamber next year and face taker for whc title at wrestlemania. And of course, taker will retain the title.
Yeah. Cena landing the way he did resulted in the broken neck. And I was happy when Batista beat Cena too. 2008 was a very bad year for Cena.
I’m also going to have to side with everyone on that a loss to Taker tarnished no one, except for Punk. Probably the only reason Austin and Rock never fought Taker at mania was because WWE came up with a better draw, being Rock/Austin. Besides, they were the main title contenders while Taker had his own thing going so without the need to put the Title on Taker they wouldn’t have him face either guy. But Taker’s matches with Austin were mor enjoyable then the Rock. More personal hatred.
Icang wrote:
Your language is not offensive at all, thanks. Kane is very bad right now, and most of his matches get the “boring” chant. That’s what I was referring to. And even earlier, the masked Kane couldn’t do any of Taker’s athletic moves like suicide dive, old school, flying clothesline, etc. His tombstone piledrivers were also not that good, although his choke-slams were better. But right now he is pathetic.
I know that Cena did not lose his credibility due to the loss to Orton at Mania 24, but that was not a singles’ match. Losing in a different PPV is a different thing, and losing at Mania is a different thing to an extent. Even Taker’s loss to Batista at Cyber Sunday 2007 is not that significant as compared to his victory against Batista at Mania 23. I think that if Cena loses to Taker in singles’ competition at Mania and gets his name added to the Streak’s victim-list, it will hurt his image more than the loss at Mania 24 or more than loss at any other smaller PPV. I think that is precisely why Stone Cold and Rock also didn’t face Taker at Mania during the attitude era, but HHH did. Similarly, Cena might not face Taker at Mania, but Orton/ Edge/ Batista did.
Kingpin wrote:
That’s ok :-) but I still think that Taker vs Cena at Mania will never happen. 10 years later when Taker retires ;-) remember I told you so, he he.
Taker vs Cena I Hope This 2 Be 18-0
If Taker vs Cena will never happen at Wrestlemania, who is Taker going to face at WM after he defeats Jericho at WM 26? Another youngsters who can’t possibly threat The Streak? Even if Ted DiBiase Jr, who is rumored and worshipped by IWC to end The Streak, faces The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 27, he would pose no bigger threat than Cena.
But then again, we are entitled to our own opinion.
i think undertaker vs chris jerico will be a scre of wm and will not be asd goood as taker vs cena because undertaker is the phenom of the wwe and cena is the face of wwe both of them colliding defines wm and in my opinion wwe should scrap taker vs y2j and defenetly do cena vs undertaker
Mr. 0 wrote:
Cena doesn’t have anything to claim as to why he will break the streak either. Batista claimed that he had never lost the title (he had surrendered it once due to injury) before WM 23, Edge claimed that he had an un-pinned streak at Mania and that Taker has never defeated him in singles’ competition before WM 24, Shawn claimed that Taker had never defeated him in singles’ competition before WM 25…. Cena can’t make any such claims. He has been pinned at Mania by Orton, and he has also lost in singles’ competition to Taker before in other PPV’s/ weekly shows, so he can’t put forth any reason as to why he can end the streak like these guys did. There could be many guys with whom Taker can feud with for subsequent Manias after Jericho…. it could be Punk, it could be Shelton Benjamin, it could be Jack Swagger, it could be Ted Dibiase…. honestly, how many more Mania’s does Taker have left? I think he will go on till 20-0 and after that, he might not remain regular. He could make special appearances which lead up to a Mania match, though.
Omar Tito wrote:
Most likely, its going to be Cena vs Batista in a brand supremacy match.
Icang wrote:
Trindle wrote:
So was I. But that is what makes me feel that Cena will win this time at Mania against Batista.
Trindle wrote:
Taker vs Austin happened at so many PPVs – if they wanted to make it happen at Mania, they could have done it easily instead of letting Taker fight guys like Big Bossman and Austin fight guys like Scott Hall. But they didn’t want to put Stone Cold/ Rock in Taker’s streak. I think its the same for Cena, otherwise it could’ve already happened.
Once again we are entitled to our own opinion. I still think taker will face cena at wm 26 or wm 27.
@mayank
shridhar: suicide dive, old school, spinning flying clothesline are moves that no one can do except taker.
Back then at 1996-1998 when taker was 330 lbs, taker often did suicide dives. I think during the ministry era, taker never did suicide dive because he was heel or his body was too big. Just imagine ministry taker did a suicide dive to the rock and austin. If he did, i think the fans wouldn’t boo him. Again, suicide dive is a move that outperform every moves in wrestling, especially when someone who does it is a 300lbs superstar.
Well a Cena/Batista wrestlemania rematch is far off from happening considering their on opposite brands and Batista won’t win the rumble a second time. Taker and Austin had a better chance of facing eachother at Wrestlemania 15 (Austin/Rock) then Wrestlemania 18 (Austin/Hall). But I don’t know if you saw, but Ric Flair in his DVD explained Undertaker personally wanted to have a match with Flair at Wrestlemania 18. So that eliminated the possibility of Austin fighting Taker. But of course, we all have own opinions, but I highly doubt Rock and Austin didn’t fight Taker because it was over credibility issues.
Icang wrote:
Yes, I personally didn’t like Taker’s in-ring performance during the ministry era. I think I liked it most during the lord of darkness era (when considering only his first 4 personas). During the ministry era, it was all about being a heel, cheating and promoting other stars rather than performing the way he used to. However, I think Taker’s weight during the ministry era was more or less the same as when he was LOD or American Bad-a**.
Trindle wrote:
Luckily, they didn’t, ‘coz HHH and Flair gave better matches than they could have given with Taker, perhaps. The HHH match was a classic to say the least. Imagine having Rock and Austin listed on the streak page on WWE.com as victims. I have a feeling that won’t go well – can’t describe it completely, but it just feels like so many of their fans who made them the top dogs of the attitude era won’t buy into it. You can have Flair, HHH and Michaels out there on that list, but you can’t have Hogan, Rock or Austin listed there, I think.
Trindle wrote:
I said brand supremacy match, Raw vs Smackdown :) if Cena loses the title before Mania and is not in a title match, then its very likely that you could have Cena vs Batista.
When Orton lost to Taker at WrestleMania that elevated his game. All the others after that with the exception of Mark Henry didn’t lose any credibility. I’m talking big names now. Cena is the only one left. Everybody talks about last years Mania as the greatest WresteMania match of all time & that is hard to dispute. We all know the names that’s left Cena is the biggest name left. I might be in the minority here but I think he can give a solid match. As I’ve said before The Andre the Giant of this generaation Undertaker vs The Hulk Hogan of this generation John Cena. Can you hear Vince’s pockets cha ching $$$.
Platon wrote:
Agree, for Vince money is everything. He knows Taker vs Cena at future Wrestlemania, regardless of the outcome, will make millions by hype only, let alone many other things related to the match. I don’t see why he won’t put Cena against Taker at Wrestlemania if it will bring him money.
Mayank Shridhar wrote:
Until now, HHH vs Taker at WM 17 was regarded as an instant classic. You may not believe this, but there are many that considered Taker vs Flair at WM 18 as a legendary brawl between two legends as well. I’ve read many comments in youtube saying Taker vs Flair was definitely a better quality match than Rock vs Hogan, and undeniably, the true match of the night. Even Flair himself has stated in one occasion that his match with Taker at WM 18 was the match that restarted his career. Personally, I think Flair vs Taker was an instant classic as well.
Rock was defeated in many occasions at Wrestlemania, but he didn’t lose a single credibility. Austin was finally defeated by Rock at WM 19, and he didn’t lose credibility. Hogan was defeated by Warrior (who is undeniab y a far lesser legend that Undertaker) and Rock at Wrestlemania, but he didn’t lose credibility. Bret Hart was defeated by Shawn Michaels at Wrestlemania, but he didn’t lose credibility. You want to know why? Simple, it’s their name that helped them maintain their credibility. Their name is so big that a single lost wouldn’t lower their credibility.
Believe me, Mayank. Cena won’t lose a single credibility losing against Undertaker at Wrestlemania. Although I’m new in here, I hope u don’t mind me having a different opinion from u.
I found this questions and answers good enough to explain your concern about Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania. If u don’t mind, please check them out:
http://answers.yahoo.com/quest.....KIOR56r6aa
http://answers.yahoo.com/quest.....KIOR56r6aa
Platon wrote:
Orton then was not what Cena is now.
Mr. 0 wrote:
So would have Austin vs Taker at Mania, but it never happened. Wouldn’t it have crossed Vince’s mind then?
Mr. 0 wrote:
It still remains.
Mr. 0 wrote:
I liked the Flair match as well – in fact, that was the biggest name which ever got added to the Streak.
Mr. 0 wrote:
Of course, you can have whatever opinion you like. Its not the loss in the match which matters, according to me. I’m not saying that they lost credibility. I’m just saying it will hurt Cena’s image as top-face of Raw. Rock losing to Austin, Austin losing to Rock, Bret losing to Shawn – all that was fine because they don’t have a “streak” list like Taker has. Every Mania, during Taker’s promo, there will be videos played of his earlier victims, and I just have this feeling that the WWE didn’t want to put names like Hogan, Austin and Rock there…. and they didn’t want to put those names on the Streak page because they were leaders of their generations/ era. While Flair might be the greatest of all time in many ways, you’d still agree that Hogan was the popular leader of the WWF in their era and not Flair. Similarly, no matter how great HBK and HHH are, the leaders during the attitude era were Stone Cold and Rock.
Mr. 0 wrote:
I read them, but I don’t usually go by what fans say. I have my own thoughts which I put up on my blog (click on my picture to read).
I’ll stand by my point that I don’t see Taker vs Cena happening at Mania. If it does happen though, I’ll be really happy that jack-a** Cena’s name will get added to the streak and every kid will know who the real man is. But I doubt if that will happen.
Mayank Shridhar wrote:
This is what I want to hear! Cheers (^^)
Unfortunatly Mayank, if this was a true debate, you’d probably lose because you don’t have much evidence to back your feelings up about why Austin and Rock would lose credibility if they lost to Taker at Wrestlemania.
There is too much evidence against what you think is true to say otherwise. Half the people who’ve lost a big Wrestlemania match had their careers elivated. Austin at Wrestlemania 13, Kane at Wrestlemania 14, and Flair and Hogan at Wrestlemania 18. Not to mention other wrestlers like John Cena who’s near win over Kurt Angle in his debut made him look like the real deal.
Sorry, Austin and Rock losing Taker wouldn’t hurt their image. You could argue that Austin was constantly hogging the spotlight of the Rock since it took Rock 5 years to finally score a win over Austin. But the only possible reason neither faced Taker at Wrestlemania was because it wouldn’t have as big as the two main champions of that year squaring off against eachother.
Hi guy it is me Frank I am the 1 send the new to Dan the Report and for what ever reason what not one find and send to Dan that I have no idea you guy that veiw this site really mush not like Secoops because that report post on 10 of November I do not go on the site until the 11 of November and when on site think someone send already by know do so i e-mail and send to Dan as fast could this 1 I that I someone would send the some I did but know one did so for 1st time I the only who send something with know elf send in with me and get all credit YEAH. But anyway this was report that prove Undertaker WILL fight Chris Jericho at WM26 for the World Champion Undertaker will walk in to WM26 as the World Champion and walk of WM as the World Champion and go 18-0 at WM he needed to main event!Undertaker have never been the Champion going in to WM WWE need someone in the main event that they can TRUE!Unlike the BS main event that have last year with HHH and Orton who already had a long fend toogally. WWE need to get I say soon WWE is know start to have Undertaker in a match every week on TV I this WWE is thinking that Undertaker is ready to be the World Champion however long WWE need him to be Champion rember Undertaker only the World Champion or won the World Champion is because Jeff Hardy left I know that they is dumb and not right but the truth.And for people how that the Jericho-Taker fend can’t not have been now because he vs. him on SD then vs. him and the Big Show at SS WRONG!Undertaker could pin Big Show or make Big Show tap out with the Hell Gate.And How many matchest again do WWE make John Cena and Randy Orton go this year alone?And know count the in 2007 and 2008!And for people who say that Chris Jericho put too many long guy over like JTG,MVP,Koif that is wrong because Undertaker let Vladimir Kozlov go over him so you wrong about!Undertaker need some he have need face before at WM and Chris Jericho is the guy!By to then go off post this and said that is Undertaker and Stone Cold vs. at WM who would WIN?I hit my for doing this by Stone Cold if he the charge to face the Undertaker.Undertaker steak would have END along time ago!Stone Cold was better then Undertaker he is the reason WWE is still alive today!With no Stone Cold that would be no WWE today no WM more Undertaker and no steak!Stone Cold never lose to Undertaker in a clean match the only Undertaker could be Stone Cold was by cheat!Sorry guy by the True.And you know I am a HUGE Undertaker fan because everytime I comment here I alway have should good then about Undertaker.So when read don’t take this as bash this is my opiean.Maybe Undertaker could beat the Rock at WM but that is no way in hell Stone Cold would have lose to the Undertaker at WM and that is the truth!
Please check out this link http://jaden3.xanga.com/715246.....r-25-2009/ and http://jaden3.xanga.com/715149.....-this-ppv/ and Enjoy it Undertaker/WWE Fans!
Frank wrote:
I like to start off by saying this post does not prove anything. And it doesn’t even mention that Taker will be the champion by then. I’m not saying we probably won’t have Taker/Jericho but this post doesn’t make it true. Wrestlemania is still far off and anything can happen.
I would also like to remind you that Undertaker has beaten Austin cleanly. They faught twice in 97 and Taker won each of those boughts cleanly and one of those times was when Austin was challenging Undertaker for Taker’s title and lost via tombstone. Each time afterwords Taker beat austin using cheats because Taker was a heel so what did you expect? So I suggest you take your truth somewhere else, but it’s just false assumptions.
Trindle wrote:
A I don’t know want but you wrong I don’t rember Undertaker ever vs Stone Cold before 98 I don’t ever think Undertaker vs Stone Clod in 97 one-one and even if he do you got rember Trindle that Stone Cold was not a top superstar yeah in the WWE Stone Cold have not been the WWE Champion and really anything until 98 so if Undertaker did get clean win on Stone Cold was don’t true by then I little boy at the time and was not alot to watch wrestling when I little my mom would not let me.Me my older brother would have to watch behind her back so may not rember.I will try to find youtube.com but I don’t think he got clean win against Stone Cold by again Stone Cold at the your saying he beat clean Undertaker was the top guy in the WWE and Stone Cold was not even a top contener yeah.That like saying that Kurt Agale beat John Cena cleanly in 1st match so does make Kurt Agale better then John Cena?Key world when John Cena vs. Kurt Agale it was 1st match in WWE so we all Kurt Agale because top superstar AT THE TIME!If Kurt Agale came back to the WWE would he still be abold to be John Cena cleanly?NO he would not he would half to cheat to win.So yeah can Stone Cold cleanly when a no name guy but one Stone Cold became the WWE top guy the only Undertaker could be Stone Cold is by CHEAT!So yeah Stone Cold all in all is the better wrestler then Undertaker and would have end the steak if Stone Cold have change to vs. him!Your luck Stone Cold career did to that sad Injury or the steak would have end!And my comment are not bad and this report does prove along Undertaker WILL vs. Chris Jericho at WM26 for the World Champion Undertaker will walk in to WM26 as the World Champion and walk of WM as the World Champion and go 18-0 at WM!And will let the long title run keep going on!
In 97, Austin was starting to get popular. He wasn’t the top guy, but he was up there with the best. He was working with guys like Shawn Michaels, Dude Love, Bret Hart, and The Undertaker. And their rivalry occured after Wrestlemania 13, when Austin won over the crowd for his submission match agaisnt Bret Hart. It was a great contest between the two of them. The other match in 97 was one that took place prior to the Royal Rumble. It occured on a Raw. Go look it up on Youtube if you don’t believe me. You’ll find the Raw one over the ppv match where Taker was champion. And to let you know, I didn’t start watching wrestling until Royal Rumble 98. It was not until much later that I started watching matches that occured in the past and even now I still come across moments I never saw. And if you want to get technical, when Taker and Austin faced eachother at Judgement Day 2001, Taker was going to win the match had Vince and Triple H not interfered in the match. But that is if you want to get technical. And I wasn’t saying either man was better then the other, although Taker has a wider variety of moves then Austin does. Had the two faced one another at Wrestlemania the outcome would have been unpredictable.
And just how do you believe this report claims Taker will still be champion and be facing Jericho by Wrestlemania? With the idea that Taker might have faced Vince at Wrestlemania would have to mean Taker would not be champion going into the ppv. For Taker to defend the World Title against Vince at wrestlemania would be preposterous so that would indicate he wouldn’t be champion. It is the WWE so anything can happen and is possible so I’m not ruling out Taker/Jericho at the ppv or the idea of Taker still being champion by then, but the report is just a rumor and proves nothing. It’s all just talk for the time being.
Trindle wrote:
As I said, its not the Mania loss which matters. I’m aware of the losses which Austin and Rock had at Mania, and you guys don’t need to remind me about them because I’m not talking about those win-loss statistics or evidence. I’m trying to highlight the difference between losing to Bret Hart (or any other) versus losing to Taker. Nobody else has such a victim-streak. What matters is getting added to the victim-list of the Streak and have your name announced as a Streak-victim every time that video is played in promos 100s of times before Wrestlemania each year, and have it permanently engraved on the Streak page on WWE.com website. Rock and Austin have faced other opponents like Hogan and Scott Hall respectively. Instead, couldn’t they do a match with Taker? Taker vs Austin was such a long rivalry which happened multiple times across multiple personas of Taker and in many PPVs, but it never reached Mania. Couldn’t McMahon have thought of doing it at Mania once? Flair, Michaels, HHH and others can afford to be in that list, but I don’t think Hogan, Austin, Rock can. I’m not convinced that “they didn’t fight Taker because they were always fighting each other which made a bigger draw” because surely, (for example) Austin vs Scott Hall couldn’t have been that big a draw. They could’ve fought Taker at any Mania and the story-creation/ build-up wouldn’t have taken a lot of effort. But the WWE didn’t want it to happen at Mania. For some reason, even Brock Lesnar never faced Taker at Mania though he faced him at many other PPV’s, and that HIAC match between them was all about proving that Brock is better than Taker, when we damn well know he isn’t. The only reason why I’m able to digest that loss is that Kane used it as one of the excuses to bury Taker alive, saying that he showed “weakness” and a monster has no weakness – so basically, it served as part of the story to bring the demon of Death Valley back. We’ll see if Taker ever faces Cena – if he does, I’ll be proven wrong. But I doubt if it will ever happen at Mania.
Trindle wrote:
Looking at the way Taker is being given a relaxed schedule with promos and tag matches, I’m assuming the WWE want him to hold on to the title for as long as he can. So I’m going with it that Taker will be the champion till and beyond Mania unless there is an injury – I don’t think the story-line will be against him, otherwise.
After the Raw in the Garden I just watch the beginning of WrestleMania 26 promo. Cena vs Taker