This was exactly what I mentioned on the other post regarding Punk’s losing streak lately. I said that he would look “weak”, but I guess that wasn’t the right word to use. I don’t know what to call it, but I’m sure you guys get where I’m coming from.

I can’t wait to see how this storyline plays out. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the ride guys.

fuck cena taker is going to beat punk at wm

It looks like it would only makes sense for Punk to defeat the Deadman at this point, but maybe Punk’s loss of momentum will actually end by losing to Taker, then he can pick himself back up and, as reported in some “sources”, beat the “unstoppable force” Brock Lesnar after Mania either as a face or tweener. That would resurrect Punk all the way to the top and make Lesnar look a bit vulnerable, because Lesnar won’t lose to HHH without retaining a dominant image. WWE needs that.

As much as I wanted Taker vs Brock, a storyline with shoots and a great MMA-esque match at Mania, I guess Punk could deal with Brock the same way. Who knows — maybe Taker will end up facing Lesnar at WM 30 if not Cena, in what could potentially be his final match. Sadly we won’t get to see epics like Rock/Taker, Austin/Taker, (either Brock or Cena/Taker) and Sting/Taker. All thanks to WWE giving him 2 same opponents in a 4 year span and taking 2 years off his career with instant rematches.

I dont think anyone loses face for losing to Undertaker at WM. Yes its a foregone conclusion (although perhaps not so much now hes 20 – 0) but its not so much about the outcome, its about the match. Wrestling a good match against Taker can push CM Punk even higher. Imagine if he does give a good match against Taker, coming close to winning, showing off more style and flair than he already has (CM Punk btw is my other favourite wrestler, being excellent mic skills, match skills and). It could push his career to new heights (Yes I am baffled by the WWEs usage of Cena as the top dog as hes no where NEAR that fucking good)

I think undertaker will returns next week at raw old school and feud with cm punk or other superstar

Ok, three things to be quick:

1) I’m really happy that it is going to happen and yes this is a rumour but I’m positively sure that next week he’ll return. I immediately thought of Taker during Punk’s promo so yeah

2) The Streak should never end-period

3) Punk loosing to Cena didn’t damage him, he never lost to cena cleanly. And loosing to the Rock, didn’t damage him at all, they seem to forget he was the most dominant WWE Champion of all time( IMO)- so that only stopped him not damage him

Loosing to The Undertaker will only put Punk in a better position and his character could be more clearly defined, as the the former champion who still lives in a World were he’s the WWE champion and he’s the best, when in fact he’s not

Loosing three matches to big stars in a row doesn’t damage your character-loosing to lower card superstars or loosing for no reason hurts a Superstar(Zack Ryder comes to my mind).

Anyway these are rumours but I’m positive Taker’s coming back next week :)

Renzo The DeadGamer wrote:

Anan wrote:

Ok, three things to be quick:
1) I’m really happy that it is going to happen and yes this is a rumour but I’m positively sure that next week he’ll return. I immediately thought of Taker during Punk’s promo so yeah
2) The Streak should never end-period
3) Punk loosing to Cena didn’t damage him, he never lost to cena cleanly. And loosing to the Rock, didn’t damage him at all, they seem to forget he was the most dominant WWE Champion of all time( IMO)- so that only stopped him not damage him
Loosing to The Undertaker will only put Punk in a better position and his character could be more clearly defined, as the the former champion who still lives in a World were he’s the WWE champion and he’s the best, when in fact he’s not
Loosing three matches to big stars in a row doesn’t damage your character-loosing to lower card superstars or loosing for no reason hurts a Superstar(Zack Ryder comes to my mind).
Anyway these are rumours but I’m positive Taker’s coming back next week :)

One loss to Cena means notjing as Punk beat him in every other match they had. They had so many together, I lost count of how many they actually had. MITB 2011, Summerslam 2011, Night Of Champions 2012 are the ones I remember, but I know there’s more as this has been a pretty long rivalry.

To respond to your 3 points:
1. Agreed. Can’t really say more as you said everything there was to say there.
2. The is obvious by now. It shouldn’t end by anyone, but Taker himself. I see The Streak ending by him when he retires as he won’t be able to defend it anymore. So in that sense, it ends in the form of an era. In other words, it ends unbroken. The only way I’d accept The Streak to end by someone is if Taker pushes strongly for it. It’s long been rumored that he feels it should end as it’s becoming too big. In a sense, he’s right as The Streak is bigger than both World Title matches at WM as the belts are regarded, hyped and built as a prestigious prize and the accomplishment of a dream people had when they were kids. They’re always saying if you’re not there to be Champion, then you shouldn’t be there. So as big as those golden belts are, an undefeated record is bigger. To the point of where people will pay to watch or attend just for that match alone.

3. What you said here mirrors what I said in an earlier post.

Agreed
Agreed
and Agreed finally you see the light
Loosing two ppv’s and a match to Cena does not make Punk look weak. The last match he lost was to HHH, so i do not know what they are bitching about. every superstar has a loosing streak. Punk is just getting his, and I personally do not like him stating he is GOD.
Now Maybe just maybe a match with with Punk might be a little too much for Taker. I am just saying dont you think its a little too early after a long recovery with a superstar that has great endurance? I just do not want to see things down played. but we will seeb>@ Anan:

xikar wrote:

Anan wrote:

Agreed
Agreed
and Agreed finally you see the light
Loosing two ppv’s and a match to Cena does not make Punk look weak. The last match he lost was to HHH, so i do not know what they are bitching about. every superstar has a loosing streak. Punk is just getting his, and I personally do not like him stating he is GOD.
Now Maybe just maybe a match with with Punk might be a little too much for Taker. I am just saying dont you think its a little too early after a long recovery with a superstar that has great endurance? I just do not want to see things down played. but we will seeb>@ Anan:

What do you mean I have finally seen the light? I’ve long been of the belief that wins and losses mean nothing to anyone’s career. If it did, everyone would have to win all the time and that is just not possible because someone has to lose.

You don’t like Punk stating he’s a GOD? Good. That means Punk’s doing his job. As a heel, he’s supposed to get people to hate him or dislike what he’s saying.

Is it too much for Taker? I trust the man’s judgment probably more than a lot of others. Don’t you think that if Taker felt the way you did that he’d skip this year? He’s not a guy with an ego so big that he needs to work WM, 100% or not. Look at 1994 and 2000. He skipped those shows. If necessary, he’d skip this year too. SO no, IMO, it’s not too much. But as always, I take a wait and see approach to Taker as that is the only logical thing to do. People get so worked up over speculation and rumors. I choose not to get stressed and worked up over things that aren’t confirmed nor denied. With Taker, only seeing is believing. I’ll believe what I see whether it;s a return or whatever it is when I see it, not when I read a comment or a report.

they should make him go insane like edge did in 08 during the build up to their hell in a cell

“A few words can describe this, Wrestlemania, Triple H, HBK, Undertaker, Triple threat, World Heavyweight Championship, Farewell”.

How does this possibly confirm anything when these people aren’t inside the wwe room an have no way of knowing what creative is planning?

So Punk should win over Taker at WM so his feelings won’t be hurt? Really? It’s about time Punk gets on the “losing” end of things. I tire so much of his endless whining, although I know it’s what he supposed to do, but I’m tired of it to the point I don’t even want to watch anything he appears on. If Take thinks it’s time for the streak to end, the he should decide & decide who it should be. Do I feel Punk is worthy enough to be the one to do it? Heck no!! There is or will be someone else who deserves that honor. If anyone should have, or had, the honor of ending the streak it is Shawn Michaels.

Lisa wrote:

Anan wrote:

So Punk should win over Taker at WM so his feelings won’t be hurt? Really? It’s about time Punk gets on the “losing” end of things. I tire so much of his endless whining, although I know it’s what he supposed to do, but I’m tired of it to the point I don’t even want to watch anything he appears on. If Take thinks it’s time for the streak to end, the he should decide & decide who it should be. Do I feel Punk is worthy enough to be the one to do it? Heck no!! There is or will be someone else who deserves that honor. If anyone should have, or had, the honor of ending the streak it is Shawn Michaels.

No one’s saying Punk should end The Streak. If anyone is, they don’t know what they’re saying.

“There is or will be someone else who deserves that honor. If anyone should have, or had, the honor of ending the streak it is Shawn Michaels.”

Really? I seriously have to question this because it makes less sense than Punk or Cena.
When HBK met Taker at WM25, he was a year away from retiring. WM26 was planned to be HBK’s last match since 2009 as he revealed in an interview in 2009 that he was thinking of retiring at WM the following year. If HBK did end The Streak, it’d be a waste sicne he had no future and nothing to prove. The guy’s already am ego so big that it needs it’s own zip code as The King likes to say. He’s constantly self-centered and always brags about himself. After being retired at WM, he still calls him Mr. WM. And he’s calling himself Mr. HOF too. If I was in the HOF, I’d take that as a slap in the face. He is not Mr. HOF simply because he isn’t the only HOF’er. Unlike Punk, who’s playing a heel, HBK’s not playing a face or heel role so he doesn’t have to be hated. But he’s making it easy for me to hate his massively inflated ego. He had to stick his ego in Taker-HHH 3. Granted, he added to the match. But he just can’t stay away from the spotlight and shows up when the spotlight shines the brightest – WM Season.

So no, HBK doesn’t deserve to end The Streak. The fact is the only one deserving to end The Streak is the man who owns it, Taker himself. He can end it one of two ways:
1. Hand pick someone to have that accolade.
2. End it himself by retiring undefeated thus signaling the end of an era as The Streak can no longer be defended once Taker’s retired. Hence, it ends unbroken.

Option 2 is the only logical route at this point as the time for The Streak to end long passed. If it was gonna end, it should have been done before WWE acknowledged The Streak and how important it was to Taker. So obviously, they’re way beyond that point now. I will only respect and accept the reality of The Streak being broken by someone if Taker decides that to be the best choice and hand selects the one to do it. If he does not, then it shouldn’t end. Ever. Simple as that.