1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

The Undertaker is an American professional wrestler signed to WWE. He is the company's most tenured performer, and he's also the only remaining active competitor from the very first episode of WWE Raw in 1993. Calaway began his wrestling career with World Class Championship Wrestling (WCCW) in 1984. In 1990, Calaway signed with the World Wrestling Federation.
Official Links
  • WWE.com
  • Undertaker Official Profile
  • Undertaker Official Videos
  • Undertaker @ WWEShop.com
  • SyFy.com Undertaker DOES NOT have a Twitter/Facebook or other internet profile, any you may find should be reported as fakes no matter how convincing they appear to be.
  • Latest Images
    Network

  • Officially-Emma.Com
    Official Fansite of NXT Diva Emma
  • MichelleMcCool.Net
    Official Fansite of Michelle McCool
  • CelesteBonin.Net
    Official Website of WWE Diva Kaitlyn
  • DolphZiggler.Com
    Dolph Zigglers Official Fansite
  • ScytherPodcasts.Net
    The new home of Beyond The Mat
  • Site Friends
  • Kanes-Inferno.com
    Best source for Kane
  • TrishStratus.com
    Official Website of Trish Stratus
  • J-Cena.com
    Top Source for John Cena


  • Stats & Disclaimer
    Owner: Jen
    Founder: Dan (Opened 2003)
    Reporters: Terry, Anan & Ed
    Site Twitter: Click Here!
    Contact Site: E-Mail
    Host: Steven
    Design: Cristy
    Online:
    This website is in no way affiliated with or linked to The Undertaker though we are Approved! The names of all World Wrestling Entertainment televised and live programming, talent names, images, likenesses, slogans, wrestling moves and all World Wrestling Entertainment logos and trademarks are the exclusive property of World Wrestling Entertainment. The images included on this site are being used under fair copyright law 107, no copyright infringement is intended. Please do not sue us, I don't have any money anyway so all you'd get is fluff.
    Fantasy Booking – Wrestlemania
    Date: February 2nd: By Anan: 16 Comments

    From now till WM, every blog I post will be centered around Wrestlemania. The Undertaker’s currently competed in 20 Wrestlemania events. Therefore, his undefeated streak stands at 20-0. But while most of his opponents have gave him WM quality matches, there’s been a few that have not. And when I found out who his opponents would be at WM’s 9, 11, and 22, I thought about who would be a better opponent and how these matches could end up happening. So I compiled a list which I have posted below as a fantasy blog and have added the other WM events that I felt needed a change for The Phenom. So feel free to read them and leave feedback on the comments board.

    Before I go on, let me state for those who are looking to attack me, his is a fantasy blog if things I want to happen. But that doesn’t mean they will. If they do, great, If not, it won’t kill me. If you agree with me, great. If not, that’s ok. But please, no attacks. I look forward to your thoughts.

    1993 – I would’ve booked Taker to win the Royal Rumble and have him in the WWF Title match here against Bret Hart. I’d have Taker win and not have Hogan challenge him right after like he did as soon as Yokozuna won the gold from Bret. SInce Hogan was on his way out of WWF, I’d have Taker defeat him for the second time at a later PPV, perhaps KOTR to end Hogan’s run.

    1995 – Bam Bam Bigelow, Tatanka or IRS would’ve been better opponents so I’d have one of them face Taker. Probably Bam Bam as he and Taker were agile for their size and so Taker wouldn’t be stuck with a so-so worker in Bundy and Bam Bam wouldn’t be stuck with a football player. Kama, The Supreme Fighting Machine would’ve made a great opponent too as would Hakushi. But Hakushi was still new and Kama was saved for Summerslam so all things considered, I’d book Taker vs Bam Bam.

    1997 – I was a fan of Sid’s character. But he wasn’t really the best big man to compete in the ring. I’d have Taker face either Vader or Mankind for the WWF Title. Vader would’ve made more sense as Taker could get payback from the Royal Rumble on both him and Paul Bearer.

    1999 – With all due respect to Ray Trayler (a.k.a. Bossman, R.I.P.), he just wasn’t the right opponent for Taker. Looking at the roster that WWF had in 1999, the perfect candidate would probably be Big Show. Sure, he just debuted a month earlier. But by then, he was already an experienced veteran and he was better in 1999 than he is now in terms of his position with the company and in ring skills. He did things he probably wouldn’t even attempt to do now. I remember in WCW, he did a missile dropkick and a splash (which he missed) off the top rope! And on the pilot episode of Smackdown in April of 1999, he hit Test with a standing vertical dropkick. It’d be awesome to see stuff like that from him at a WM. So I’d have Taker vs Big Show in Hell In A Cell.

    2001 – I would’ve had Taker in the WWF Title match here since it was the closing match and being that this was Taker’s first WM since returning in 2000. Plus, WM was in Taker’s hometown of Houston, TX. How fitting would it be to have Taker win his fourth World Title here? The match he had with HHH was one of the definite highlights. But it could have been saved for another PPV and end up being a Title match with Taker defending the gold.

    2002 – Taker and Austin met at Backlash to decide who the #1 Contender would be. A match between Austin & Taker is WM worthy. So I’d book that over Taker/Flair and Austin/Hall. Flair said Taker requested to face him. And I commend Taker for that. But Flair could have been involved at WM in a non wrestling role too as guest referee like he was at Backlash instead of wrestling or wrestle Scott Hall. It would be his choice. So basically, I’d have the match that happened at Backlash happen at WM with the exception of the #1 Contender stipulation, which I’d save for Backlash to carry the feud there from WM.

    2003 – Taker vs a heel Eddie Guererro or Benoit would’ve been a far better match than what Taker actually got. I’d have him face Guererro here and save Benoit for a future WM. Big Show already lost to Taker a month before at No Way Out, A-Train wasn’t ready for Taker and Nathan Jones was new so he definitely was far from ready to have anything to do with Taker.

    2006 – I’d have Taker vs Kurt Angle here. No question about it. It made the most sense and it was the perfect time to have them face off at WM since Kurt Angle won by a thread as he was nearly unconscious at No Way Out and in the rematch, Mark Henry interfered. So Taker could tell Angle that at No Way Out, he had his number and would have defeated him on Smackdown had it not been for Mark Henry. Angle would agree with him and said he wants to beat Taker in the middle of the ring and cement his legacy by ending The Streak. Now Kurt himself stated that Taker picked him to end it. So had this match happened, The Streak may not exist today so in that regard, it’s probably a good thing it didn’t end up taking place. But that doesn’t change the fact that Mark Henry was a poor choice for an opponent. I mean, they could have had Taker vs Benoit instead.

    It is unknown at this point if taker will be at WM29 or any other WM for that matter. None of us nor the reporters have any contact with Taker of his doctors. So what anyone says is pure speculation and their own opinion, which is fine. But I’m not believing anything till I get an official confirmation. As for the reports, they’re nothing but rumors. Provided, however he does go on…..

    2013 – I’ll respect Taker’s decision if he chooses not to defend The Streak at WM. But since WM29 will be my first live WM and the fact that WM just isn’t WM without a Taker match, I hope and pray he competes. If not, I’ll try selling my ticket in hopes of getting back at least some, if not all of the money I spent to purchase it. Based on what is going on right now in WWE, I’d logically book Taker vs Punk. Although Punk’s likely not gonna beat Taker, fact is he has earned the right to face him. He worked his ass off since 2011 to become, in my opinion, WWE’s current most valuable player. The Phenom vs WWE’s MVP. Has a ring to it.

    2014 – If he continues after WM29, , I’d book him to face Sting. Its’s about high time this happened. I’d really go all out to get him to sign by finding out what he wants and giving it to him. That’s really all WWE needs to do – find out everything he wants and just giving it to him.

    I know some out there will disagree with me for various reasons. But hear me out. The other potential candidates for Taker are Punk and Cena. I’m gonna add Jericho just because I’d like to see it for my own personal pleasure. They have more years in the business as they are younger than Sting is. If Cena faces Taker at WM30, then the Sting bout will have to happen at WM31. Punk is still young enough to last that long. And with Taker wrestling once a year, it’s probable he’ll compete there. And if not, so be it. Taker has fought Punk and Cena before. Punk’s become better and is a much different Punk than when Taker faced him previously. But Taker has NEVER met Sting. And I don’t count their meeting back in WCW in 1990 or whenever it was because The Undertaker was not born yet so while it was the guy portraying Taker facing Sting, fact is Mean Mark Callous is different than Taker in more ways than one. Cena, despite being an inevitable opponent, has only a few moves that he uses all the time. That makes him this generation’s Ultimate Warrior minus the rope shaking and craziness. Sting’s got more moves and more experience than Cena and so does Taker. Even though he’s never worked for WWE before, I believe Cena will step aside and allow him to face Taker. Meanwhile Cena can wait till…..

    2015 – I, nor does anyone else have any way of knowing how long Taker will go on. But if he does compete at WM29, I hope he continues to 25-0. It may not be as perfect as 30/31-0. But it is close enough. Plus, by the time he gets to 25-0, he would have beaten everyone that’s on the very short list of his potential candidates. Number 23 on the list will be John Cena. Unless of course, Taker hand picks him to break it Now if it is Taker’s choice, I’ll be fine with that. Because in the end, Taker’s legacy is a lot more than a record. However, I will not like that it’s broken so I hope it’s not. Cena’s been the top guy for quite some time now, But his time is running out. After 10 years, everything’s started to catch up with him and he is currently working at less than 100% (making his rematch with Rock for the Title and his Rumble win even more pointless.) So as of now, I cannot see Cena being selected to do the impossible.

    2016 – I’ll be honest. I do want him to face Brock Lesnar just to see Lesnar get tombstoned or be put in Hell’s Gate. But realistically, this match has a very slim to no chance of happening. First, the health status both men need to be strongly considered over anything else and in my opinion, risking their health for the sake of one match, a match that Brock doesn’t even deserve to have, is a very bad decision. Especially if they are gonna end up risking Taker’s health knowing what he means to WM. Secondly, the last date on Brock’s current contract is WM31 so if this match does happen, that would realistically be the best place for it to happen as it’d be the perfect way to write Lesnar out of WWE. And after he leaves, who knows when, who knows if he will ever be back?

    In saying all that, my second choice would be Jericho just because I wanna see it. Why? Because despite Jericho’s coming and going habit, fact is this will still be a great match. Jericho’s physical condition is currently better than Taker’s so that will go a long way in making this one a show stealer.

    2017 – Here, Taker will go 25-0 by elevating the career of another young guy (either Ryback, Ziggler, Rhodes or Barrett) or face Kane one last time. Let’s examine them one by one.

    Ziggler – He’s already got a MITB briefcase so he’s guaranteed a Title shot anytime. Now before Cena cashed in, every MITB winner won whatever Title they went after. But I don’t think Ziggler will lose like Cena did. Ziggler will take advantage of a vulnerable Champion to win whatever Title he ends up focusing on. So in my opinion, he doesn’t need the rub from Taker.

    Ryback – He’s had numerous Title shots and it’s clearly obvious that had it not been for Brad Maddox and the repeated interference by The Shield, Ryback would have won the WWE Title. I can see him becoming World Champion at some point this year. Reportedly, he will face Jericho at WM29 in order to be elevated. Being elevated, while not as effective as being elevated by Taker, is still effective enough so Ryback also does not need the rub. He’s Championship bound with or without the elevation from Jericho.

    Rhodes – When this was being typed, I didn’t know Rhodes and Sandow went their separate ways. Apparently on SD, they dissolved their team. With Team Rhodes Scholars no more, I predict better things for Rhodes. I see him eventually chasing a World Title and becoming a World Champion Being that he’s already Championship bound so he also does not need to face Taker in order to be elevated.

    Barrett – That leaves us with Barrett. Unlike the last three, he has a bit of history with Taker. In 2010, as part of The Nexus, the other members along with Barrett took Taker out on the 900th episode of RAW and at Bragging Rights, they helped Kane defeat Taker by burying him alive. By 2017, that would have been six years so I doubt very much that they’d incorporate that into the build. I believe Barrett would be a World Champion sometime within the next two years. And he still might be. But I think his elbow injury delayed him and he was out for a good while. However, I can see him being a World Champion more than once before 2017. Same gors for the other three men.

    Kane – Many won’t want this match. They feel Taker and Kane met too many times and they feel Kane’s not the same monster. They have met several times. As for not being a monster, he currently is not. But he can be. Every time he faced Taker, he was. Including 2010 when he was unmasked. I know this would be their third WM meeting. But it worked for HHH. So I think it can work for Kane. After being a loyal employee after all the shafts he’s gotten (anyone else would have requested their release and bashed WWE on various shoot interviews), he should be rewarded by retiring here (if he doesn’t retire earlier, which he might.) I’d want this to be a Title match that way Kane would retire by losing the Title and Taker’s last match would see him winning the World Title (like Trish did at Unforgiven 2006 in her final match as an official WWE employee.) It’d be perfect as the next night, Paul could come out and say now that you two have finally settled our differences, it’s time for both of you to come home and that’s that.

    I wouldn’t want a young guy as Taker’s final opponent because they can’t challenge him as effectively as a veteran can. The only veterans from Taker’s era that are currently competing Jericho, Kane and Sting. Out of all of them, Kane’s the only one who is full time in WWE while Jericho comes and goes. And if Sting faces Taker, it’ll be his only match in WWE and therefore, while I want the match to happen, Sting isn’t an ideal final opponent for Taker. But Taker is the best opponent for Sting’s final match. In saying all this, Taker’s best opponent is the only man who knows him best and could therefore could really bring it to him and that’s his own brother, Kane. Trust me. Kane will become the monster again if they were to build to this match.

    With all the same, repetitive (and negative) news coming out about Taker, I thought this blog will give us something different to discuss considering nothing regarding Taker at WM29 is officially confirmed yet. So let the debates begin!

    Post Discussion
    • Renzo The DeadGamer on February 2nd, 2013 says:

      I’ll have to agree with you here Anan :D apart from a few things. Let me start

      1993: I love it, however I feel that if the match happened three years later it would have been better due to Taker’s evolution and Bret’s experience I would have booked Taker vs Bret in 1996. But hey, 1993 would be even better in some ways.so you nailed it! They would have had a great match no doubt.

      1995: I AGREE!! I love Bam Bam. I can’t say a lot about your booking here- I agree 100%

      I am going to say something about 1996: I would have booked Bret vs Taker on this Wrestlemania and have Shawn face Diesel one last time. But what really happened was really cool as well. I thought his match with Diesel could have been a bit better though, don’t know your take on it.

      1997: I AGREE!! I’d have him face Mankind to end the feud, but Vader was awesome, so either way I agree.

      1999: I never thought about it but you actually convinced me about having Taker face Big Show that year. Hmmm I wouldn’t have minded him facing Shane McMahon though, they could have done some crazy spots. I love Shane, he’s underrated-So I guess I would have probably booked Shane or Big Show, Idk, but I like the way you put it.

      2001: I disagree with you here, IMO that’s the best WWF/WWE ppv of all time, everything was perfect. But hey, you made a very valid point and for that I wouldn’t have minded it.

      2002: I practically agree with everything here as well.

      2003: Loved it, hmm as far as either Benoit or Eddie, I’d choose Benoit just because I like him much more that’s all…Hell I would have even considered having Eddie feud with HBK and Jericho with Taker on that mania too!!

      2006 and 2013- I completely Agree

      I can’t comment on the other years because its opinions but I agree pretty much with what you said. I have to watch Smackdown yet lol

      I really liked your booking, I agreed with a lot of stuff, keep it up Anan!! :)

    • Anan on February 2nd, 2013 says:

      Renzo The DeadGamer wrote:

      Anan wrote:

      I’ll have to agree with you here Anan :D apart from a few things. Let me start
      1993: I love it, however I feel that if the match happened three years later it would have been better due to Taker’s evolution and Bret’s experience I would have booked Taker vs Bret in 1996. But hey, 1993 would be even better in some ways.so you nailed it! They would have had a great match no doubt.
      1995: I AGREE!! I love Bam Bam. I can’t say a lot about your booking here- I agree 100%
      I am going to say something about 1996: I would have booked Bret vs Taker on this Wrestlemania and have Shawn face Diesel one last time. But what really happened was really cool as well. I thought his match with Diesel could have been a bit better though, don’t know your take on it.
      1997: I AGREE!! I’d have him face Mankind to end the feud, but Vader was awesome, so either way I agree.
      1999: I never thought about it but you actually convinced me about having Taker face Big Show that year. Hmmm I wouldn’t have minded him facing Shane McMahon though, they could have done some crazy spots. I love Shane, he’s underrated-So I guess I would have probably booked Shane or Big Show, Idk, but I like the way you put it.
      2001: I disagree with you here, IMO that’s the best WWF/WWE ppv of all time, everything was perfect. But hey, you made a very valid point and for that I wouldn’t have minded it.
      2002: I practically agree with everything here as well.
      2003: Loved it, hmm as far as either Benoit or Eddie, I’d choose Benoit just because I like him much more that’s all…Hell I would have even considered having Eddie feud with HBK and Jericho with Taker on that mania too!!
      2006 and 2013- I completely Agree
      I can’t comment on the other years because its opinions but I agree pretty much with what you said. I have to watch Smackdown yet lol
      I really liked your booking, I agreed with a lot of stuff, keep it up Anan!! :)

      I was going to go with Bret in 1996 too. But they fought at Royal Rumble and Diesel cost Taker that match and Taker cost Diesel his match the next month. Plus, Bret-HBK Iron Man match was a classic.. IMO, the best match of their series of bouts. As great as Taker is, I don’t know if he can go for one hour. That’s not a knock on him. But for his character, it’s more appropriate that it’s one fall (or tap out) and done. And I don’t think Diesel could go for an hour either.

      Shane was underrated, no doubt about it. But Big Show came into the WWF with a massive amount of momentum that would have gotten even bigger by facing Taker. Shane was already in a feud with X-Pac too. Shane vs Taker wouldn’t be much of a match either. Shane may hit his usual spots. But they wouldn’t be enough. It’d only anger Taker and this squash match would’ve perhaps been shorter than Taker/Snuka lol. Ok. Maybe not that short. But a squash nonetheless. WM15 was a disaster for the most part and Taker/Show along with Austin/Rock would’ve saved it from being a total wreck.

      WM17 is the best WM of The Attitude Era. Perhaps tied with WM14. But I felt Taker should have been in the Title match was because it was his hometown. It’d also mean we wouldn’t have three Taker vs HHH matches. I would mean Austin could continue his feud with HHH, beat him and then move on to the WWF Title. Meanwhile, Taker would face Rock in a high profile match at WM, something they have not done yet. Or alternatively, Taker could face Austin at WM. Two Texans in the main event for the WWF Title in Texas at WM. What a great way for Taker to return to WM. And he was healthier then and going full time so he’d perhaps have the length of a Title run he deserves. But that’s just my opinion. I respect yours.

      Benoit or Eddie in 2003 would have been better than the handicap match. Jericho wouldn’t be a good idea IMO because he was in a feud with HBK and they ended up having the match of the night at WM19 in many people’s minds.

      Taker vs Jericho may have worked at WM2000 (although I did love the 3 Way between Jericho, Benoit and Angle) but Taker was not present then. If only Jericho came to WWF before 1999…..

      As I stated, only reason I booked Taker vs Eddie is to save Benoit for WM22, provided for some reason, Taker vs Angle did not work out.

      You know, actually now that I think of it. Taker could have had a great handicap match at WM19 against both Eddie and Benoit. As for WM22, the Taker vs Angle booking remains.

      I liked your ideas too. And I have more Fantasy Booking blogs posted if you wanna view them.

      P.S. Noticed you changed your username. I like it. Can’t help though (sorry lol), but ask a few questions about it.
      1. Why?
      2. What’s the reason for DeadGamer?
      3. Story behind Renzo, which has been around for as long as I remember?
      4. I’m gonna assume the jrtaker for your previous username was because of JR and Taker. Correct? I think the answer’s pretty obvious. But still, I’l let you answer since it was your username after all.

    • ST on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      Very nice I agre particularly with the Kane scenario I wouldn’t mind seeing it a third time. Obviously Kane was based off the biblical Cain to adegree so Ijust hope he never beats and “kills” his brother at mania someday by ending the streak

    • Anan on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      ST wrote:

      Anan wrote:

      Very nice I agre particularly with the Kane scenario I wouldn’t mind seeing it a third time. Obviously Kane was based off the biblical Cain to adegree so Ijust hope he never beats and “kills” his brother at mania someday by ending the streak

      Glad someone agrees with me regarding Kane. We’re definitely in the minority here as many don’t want it. I’m ok with being in the minority.

      I don’t see Kane doing that. Reportedly, Taker requested Kane to do it some several years back, but Kane declined. Kane’s at the end of his career and if he did ever face Taker at WM, I’d have to speculate the possibility that it’d be Kane’s last match. Especially if Kane’s goes into that particular WM as the World Champion. Regardless, Kane’s done just about everything except win the Royal Rumble. Taker won it in 2007 long after he had nothing to prove or accomplish anymore. So I feel Kane’s Rumble win is coming at some point.

      But anyway, my point is Kane’s not gonna do it. If he was done ,which I don’t think it will at this point, it’d have to be someone, a young member of the active roster who can use that boost to further their career. But I don’t see anyone deserving or ready for that mega push.

      The ship sailed a long time ago as it relates to ending The Streak and that ship isn’t ever sailing back IMO.

    • Jessica on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      I have always been a die hard taker fan- last year I was lucky enough to go to WM & see him live for the very first time! Awe inspiring! Nothing topped that entrance & the feeling you get when you hear that gong. Every week I watch a horrible RAW hoping just in case… Just maybe…. He might make an appearance! I do so miss him on my tv regularly, but hey time doesn’t slow down for any of us. Fingers crossed that he is at WM (as long as he feels good enough to be there), I’d love to see him live again- and I hope you get to do the same! Very thankful for all the awesome matches & memories he’s provided me over the years! I’ll be looking forward to a few more if he’s got a little gas left in the tank (the man has outlasted the impossible already, so nothing surprises me)! Here’s hoping for 21-0!!!

    • Anan on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      Jessica wrote:

      Anan wrote:

      I have always been a die hard taker fan- last year I was lucky enough to go to WM & see him live for the very first time! Awe inspiring! Nothing topped that entrance & the feeling you get when you hear that gong. Every week I watch a horrible RAW hoping just in case… Just maybe…. He might make an appearance! I do so miss him on my tv regularly, but hey time doesn’t slow down for any of us. Fingers crossed that he is at WM (as long as he feels good enough to be there), I’d love to see him live again- and I hope you get to do the same! Very thankful for all the awesome matches & memories he’s provided me over the years! I’ll be looking forward to a few more if he’s got a little gas left in the tank (the man has outlasted the impossible already, so nothing surprises me)! Here’s hoping for 21-0!!!

      I hope he’s at WM29 more than you as I already got my ticket the first day they went on sale even knowing it was a gamble.

    • Jennabilly Winkelman on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      Wrestlemania 15 (1999) was, in my opinion, my all-time favorite Wrestlemania. He wasn’t facing some big-shot wrestler, it occurred during my favorite persona of Taker (Ministry), and the story around it was pretty epic.
      Back then, ‘Taker didn’t need some huge wrestler to face as often, which made the matches good. I still love the matches today, don’t get me wrong, but now it’s all “The best guy can only fight him.” Which makes sense. Hey, 20-0, it’s a big deal…But I wonder how the audience would react if ‘Taker had a not-so famous wrestler step up against him one time.

    • Renzojrtaker on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      Renzo The DeadGamer wrote:

      Renzojrtaker wrote:

      I’ll have to agree with you here Anan :D apart from a few things. Let me start
      1993: I love it, however I feel that if the match happened three years later it would have been better due to Taker’s evolution and Bret’s experience I would have booked Taker vs Bret in 1996. But hey, 1993 would be even better in some ways.so you nailed it! They would have had a great match no doubt.
      1995: I AGREE!! I love Bam Bam. I can’t say a lot about your booking here- I agree 100%
      I am going to say something about 1996: I would have booked Bret vs Taker on this Wrestlemania and have Shawn face Diesel one last time. But what really happened was really cool as well. I thought his match with Diesel could have been a bit better though, don’t know your take on it.
      1997: I AGREE!! I’d have him face Mankind to end the feud, but Vader was awesome, so either way I agree.
      1999: I never thought about it but you actually convinced me about having Taker face Big Show that year. Hmmm I wouldn’t have minded him facing Shane McMahon though, they could have done some crazy spots. I love Shane, he’s underrated-So I guess I would have probably booked Shane or Big Show, Idk, but I like the way you put it.
      2001: I disagree with you here, IMO that’s the best WWF/WWE ppv of all time, everything was perfect. But hey, you made a very valid point and for that I wouldn’t have minded it.
      2002: I practically agree with everything here as well.
      2003: Loved it, hmm as far as either Benoit or Eddie, I’d choose Benoit just because I like him much more that’s all…Hell I would have even considered having Eddie feud with HBK and Jericho with Taker on that mania too!!
      2006 and 2013- I completely Agree
      I can’t comment on the other years because its opinions but I agree pretty much with what you said. I have to watch Smackdown yet lol
      I really liked your booking, I agreed with a lot of stuff, keep it up Anan!! :)

      You win everytime we counter our arguments, I love that. Yeah I agree with your reply

      As for my name…i’ll tell ya

      It changed by itself, because when I comment on my Laptop Its set for Renzojrtaker. Last night I was on my sister’s PC and on that pc it’s saved as Renzo The DeadGamer, but I’m thinking of using that instead..now that you got me on topic I really want to say it, it’s been a long time and you probably don’t remember me.

      Why? and Reason?: Because The DeadGamer is a nickname I came up with back in 2007/2008. I’m a comic book guy, and I decided to combine one 2 words that sum up Undertaker and HHH but at the same time feel cool. So I came with DeadGamer, which is kinda a name with many meanings if you break it down, LOL..that’s basically why, then I added to my real name to comment on this website

      The Story behind Renzo? lol it’s my real name, well I don’t want to tell you all my story of my reputation here but I don’t know if you remember a hot headed A-Hole back in 2008 on this website with the same name…that was me. I came here in 2007 and I wasn’t really mature when it came to online blogging and stuff like this, I used to have some really hard time with the former Webmaster here and previous guy who used to be much like you in ways, he was very creative, I can’t say his name cause he might still log on here and slap my guts( and I deserve it I game the guys back then a hard time)-but anyway. I decided to comment once in a while since like 2009, In fact I decided to come back ”full-time” here last Summer…I feel that i’ve matured and I can cope with opinions without coming out as a A-hole. A lot of guys left this site and new ones came and I want to be a normal regular undertaker fan on this site, not a jackass who wants to be better than the rest, like in the past, so yeah that’s basically it.

      Jrtaker doesn’t mean JR and taker lol..it means Junior Taker. Like a teen version of the undertaker. That’s 6 years old man haha, I was only a teen when I came up with that so yeah. The name changed because It was saved on my sister’s pc and I forgot changing it back. But I think I’m changing it altogether, here on my laptop, because jrtaker doesn’t bring a lot of good memories, for the reasons I just told you. But thanks for taking interest and keep up the good work-I’ll definitely be the first to read your Fantasy blogs and comment, i’ll try lol

      Good job with the booking!! and Thanks

    • Khaiden on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      I believe a young guy would be great for ‘Taker’s final opponent. But not just any guy, this is someone that would have been in the WWE for a year or two and has great in-ring talent. Some credibility too. His gimmick and personality already resembled ‘Taker in some way prior to entering the WWE and everyone agrees that this guy could be a dark presence in the WWE similar to how ‘Taker was.

      A long feud between the 2 ensues. Their first match is at Summerslam, the new guy changes his theme music to the Ministry song and now uses ‘Taker’s mind games, including gongs with lights going out and some druids, similar to what Kane did in 201.
      Highlights of the match include an Old School being reversed by the new guy climbing to the top rope while ‘Taker holds his arm, taking ‘Taker down and then applying old school himself; a counter to Undertaker’s running clothesline with the new guy jumping to intercept ‘Taker causing both men to crash in mid-air.
      Throughout all of this the new guy sits up many times and makes his eyes go white.
      In the end, it’s a hell of a match with the new guy kicking out of three tombstones and applying some of his own. In the end, Undertaker wins.

      The feud continues. Next major match is a casket match. Undertaker loses and the casket gets burned by a lightning bolt cast by the new guy. Of course, when it’s opened, nobody is inside.
      Before ‘Taker returns (as the genre savvy new guy expects), there is a sub-feud with Kane which leads to a Hell in a Cell match that the new guy wins. ‘Taker returns at the end to lay waste to the new guy.

      Finally, WrestleMania is near. The new guy has claimed in the whole feud that he will take Undertaker’s legacy and he is the one to defeat the streak since he is the only one who has fought ‘Taker with his own power.
      The match is Buried Alive.

      So, the stage is set. This seems to be Undertaker’s final match and heavy rumors of his retirement are everywhere, some slightly supported by JR and Paul Bearer. Undertaker always ends up buried in this match and everyone agrees this guy can be the next Deadman.

      But Undertaker wins. The new guy gets buried.

      Nearly a year later at the Elimination Chamber. An entrant of an EC is taken out. Somebody has to replace him. This entrant was a number six. As whoever is replacing him is about to come out, the lights go out. A new dark theme music hits. First unrecognizable, the new guy appears with a complete new look, sinister and ominous, yet not copying from the Undertaker this time.
      And thus, taking a page from the Undertaker, the new guy is reborn, the legacy continues with the Undertaker ending on a winning note.

      At that year’s WrestleMania, the new guy and ‘Taker (who’s entering the Hall of Fame) encounter each other. They shake hands.

      Sorry. I had to post my fantasy too. I love yours as well Anan! ‘Taker vs Kurt Angle is one I can definitely agree with. For WWE ’13 I have planned to set him up against Rock, Austin, Lesnar, Angle, Jericho, Cena and Punk (not at the same time!).

    • Jessica on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      Anan wrote:

      Jessica wrote:

      Jessica wrote:
      Anan wrote:
      I hope he’s at WM29 more than you as I already got my ticket the first day they went on sale even knowing it was a gamble.

      Hm, well that wasn’t really a “who wants to see him more” comment that I was making… But okay. Good luck.

    • Ed Burns on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      @ Anan:
      Nice booking. The only 2 I’d disagree with is 1999, and 2001. In 1999, Big Show could do some wicked feats in short matches… The only thing is Show’s cardiovascular condition was horrible. Show even said that himself about that time period. Me personally, I would have had Taker face Ken Shamrock, or Mick Foley then. Shamrock would have been a great match up with Taker as he was athletic, and capable of pulling off a great match. The match also would not have been a Cell match.

      With Foley, it wouldn’t have been a Cell match, but it could have been a First Blood match. They wouldn’t be able to top the Cell match from KOTR ’98. Those would be my 2 picks for 1999.

      In 2001, I thought the booking was perfect. That was the best WM of all time, even better than WM III, in my opinion. There’s no way they could top Austin/Rock II at that time because both guys were positioned as the top 2 guys in the Company then. They were also the hottest commodities the WWF/E had going at that time. They were the most in demand for appearances, the top merchandise guys, and that was the match the majority of Wrestling fans wanted to see. The proof of that is the fact that PPV held the buys record until WM 28. Austin/Rock II was also one of the best matches of that night, aside from the TLC match…

      The only change I would have made would be to give HHH & Taker a bit more time for their match. They had a short match compared to Austin, and The Rock’s match. Other than that, I thought the PPV worked out perfectly. Had Austin/Rock II taken place a year earlier like it was supposed to, then maybe Taker should get a shot at Austin at WM 17, but Austin’s neck surgery changed all of that…

      I definitely agree with what you said about 2006. I also wouldn’t mind if it was moved up to 2003 for the Title. Taker, and Angle had a Match Of The Year on Smackdown that year also. The only thing that ruined that match was Lesnar interfering in the match at the end. Taker/Angle is still on my wishlist to this day.

    • Anan on February 3rd, 2013 says:

      Anan wrote:

      Nice booking. The only 2 I’d disagree with is 1999, and 2001. In 1999, Big Show could do some wicked feats in short matches… The only thing is Show’s cardiovascular condition was horrible. Show even said that himself about that time period. Me personally, I would have had Taker face Ken Shamrock, or Mick Foley then. Shamrock would have been a great match up with Taker as he was athletic, and capable of pulling off a great match. The match also would not have been a Cell match.
      With Foley, it wouldn’t have been a Cell match, but it could have been a First Blood match. They wouldn’t be able to top the Cell match from KOTR ’98. Those would be my 2 picks for 1999.
      In 2001, I thought the booking was perfect. That was the best WM of all time, even better than WM III, in my opinion. There’s no way they could top Austin/Rock II at that time because both guys were positioned as the top 2 guys in the Company then. They were also the hottest commodities the WWF/E had going at that time. They were the most in demand for appearances, the top merchandise guys, and that was the match the majority of Wrestling fans wanted to see. The proof of that is the fact that PPV held the buys record until WM 28. Austin/Rock II was also one of the best matches of that night, aside from the TLC match…
      The only change I would have made would be to give HHH & Taker a bit more time for their match. They had a short match compared to Austin, and The Rock’s match. Other than that, I thought the PPV worked out perfectly. Had Austin/Rock II taken place a year earlier like it was supposed to, then maybe Taker should get a shot at Austin at WM 17, but Austin’s neck surgery changed all of that…
      I definitely agree with what you said about 2006. I also wouldn’t mind if it was moved up to 2003 for the Title. Taker, and Angle had a Match Of The Year on Smackdown that year also. The only thing that ruined that match was Lesnar interfering in the match at the end. Taker/Angle is still on my wishlist to this day.

      @Ed Burns:
      The comments board is not like it usually is. Unless this a change which I doubt it is, the board’s been acting like this all day lol. So it’ll be hard for me to get used to this and comment. But I’ll try.

      1999….I was actually thinking of Shamrock and Foley. But they were busy. Big Show, on the other hand, didn’t really have to start his feud with Foley. He could have let Foley retain the Title against Rock in the Ladder match allowing Vince to turn to Show to take care of Taker at WM instead of Bossman who was clearly past his prime by that point. I didn’t know Show said that about himself, Since he did, I will agree with you. It seemed that the Shamrock/Gunn rivalry ended without much of a conclusion due to Val’s obsession with his sister, Ryan and later dumping her. Besides, I wouldn’t want Taker and Shamrock to fight two straight PPV’s as I wasn’t a big Shamrock fan.

      2001…..regarding your points, yeah I know. I realized that and still do. Just saying though as part of my personal fantasy that would’ve had Taker in the Title match instead. While there are times I consider real life ongoings in my fantasy blogs, there are time that I do not. 2001 was one of the times I did not consider real life WWF as opposed to say 1999 or 2006 or something.
      Regarding Taker vs HHH, I liked the length of the match and thought it was perfect as the fans were into that and Austin/Rock. WM25 saw a 30 minute Taker/HBK match. What ended up happening is no one cared about anything after that because they were drained from a 30 minute classic. WM27….don’t think Taker/HHH was 30 minutes, but still, same effect. WM28…..people were into Rock/Cena and Punk/Jericho. But it was still clear to me that they were a bit out of it for awhile following HIAC. That’s what a Taker match is at WM, provided he had the right opponent and no one Bundy/Gonzalez type disaster. So if Taker/HHH, one of the highlights of the entire PPV despite it’s length, went longer which I wouldn’t mind, fact is I think it’ll have the same effect as WM28. But that’s just my view on it. Again, nt saying people won’t be into Austin/Rock. They definitely would be. But after a classic brawl that went from the ring, to the crowd, and stuff, what more could anyone expect? Had it went a bit longer, I think people will be a bit drained and wouldn’t be fully into Austin?Rock till things heated up. But because Taker’s match was the length it was, they were also into Austin/Rock, start to finish which is what a closing match should do IMO.

    • Ed Burns on February 4th, 2013 says:

      @ Anan:
      I noticed the comments section on each article didn’t look right. I’m gonna message Jen. It might also be a WordPress issue.

    • Anan on February 4th, 2013 says:

      @ Ed Burns:

      Cool. Any thoughts on my reply to you comment?

    • Ed Burns on February 5th, 2013 says:

      @ Anan:
      It’s cool… I can agree with that. I also think if they had the match with Shamrock at WM 15, the match at Backlash doesn’t happen. They could have moved up the feud with the Big Show into that slot at Backlash. Technically, the storyline with Big Show was a Raw only angle from May to June. So they could have put a number to it by building it for Backlash.

      The whole Ryan/Val Venis/Ken Shamrock/Billy Gunn thing was filler.

      The Taker/HHH match at WM 17 could have had 10 more minutes added to it in my view. Austin/Rock II, in comparison, was far better than Punk/Jericho, and the Rock/Cena match at WM 28. The crowd was amped for Rock/Austin due to the build, so I doubt they would have been drained by the time WM 17′s main event started.

      I also think the Raw GM/Smackdown GM gimmick Tag match was a total joke, and the crowd was dead for that match. The crowd also didn’t put much energy into the WWE Title match between Punk, and Jericho. That’s also why the Cell match should have been placed just before the Rock/Cena match.

      That’s why I harp on the booking. Build the PPV with each match, unlike putting on a huge match, then follow it up with filler. The crowd never really recovered from the Cell match. You can even say the crowd wasn’t all that hot for Cena/Rock too. The Cell match pipped the hype match.

      Did you see on ESPN that Bruno’s in the HOF? He agreed to it today. It’s off topic, but we talk about that via email.

    • Anan on February 5th, 2013 says:

      lol I just emailed you about Bruno before seeing this post. To steal a line from The Rock, “FINALLY…..BRUNO SAMMARTINO WILL BE INDUCTED INTO THE WWE HOF!”

      I’m gonna reply to your comment via email. Let’s continue this conversation there.

      That’s a good point too about the Big Show feud. But they would need a bit more IMO than a Chokeslam through the ring (and Taker hitting Show with a baseball bat) to get people invested in a PPV match between the two. Don’t get me wrong. That was one impressive feat. But it’s only good in my view to get people interested in a rematch on RAW, which I believe ended up happening. I mean, this is the Attitude Era we’re talking about. So they’d need more than that for a feud to a PPV match.

      Ryan/Val/Shamrock/Gunn…..at WM, it was Val vs Shamrock vs Goldust vs Road Dogg. In terms of rivalry, made no sense to have Road Dogg in there. Billy Gunn was part of the Hard Title 3 Way that was a great opener to the show. But they should have had Gunn is Dogg’s match and Dogg in Gunn’s match. Because Gunn, Shamrock, Val, Goldust all had a connection with Ryan and the build between them centered mostly around her. Dogg, Al Snow and Holly had their thing between each other too. Or at least were starting into heading into WM while Gunn/Shamrock were feuding since before the Royal Rumble with Val and Goldust becoming part of that feud heading into WM. Still, the Fatal 4 Way should have been saved for Backlash. Since Gunn and Shamrock were already feuding, it should have been them one on one for the I.C. Title. And an entertaining as I found the Hardcore Title match to be, and Gunn did great in it, I felt inserting Road Doog, who was involved with Al and Holly heading into WM, would have made it all the more better as Dogg shined in that division during that time period. They had one of the best hardcore matches on RAW. It was an impromptu match between the three on RAW that ended in the street, parking lot or wherever of whatever arena in they were at. And Al and Dogg had one of the best one on one hardcore matches that ended outside in the snow. And Holly had “Hardcore” as part of his name for a good reason so to have the three go at it at WM, it’d make for an even more entertaining opener IMO.

      Austin/Rock II better than Punk/Jericho? That’s open to interpretation. It depends how you really look at it. Austin/Rock II wasn’t a complete wrestling match. It ended up with foreign object(s) such as a chair being used at the very end. Punk/Jericho was a pure, straight up wrestling contest. They sold the story and performed it as perfectly as anyone could ever expect. The way Punk tried to use a chair, but then decided not to….and his facial expression when he held up that chair, and you knew he wanted to use it badly but couldn’t, that was pure gold in my view. Just that look alone. And the way Jericho countered Punk’s hurricarana into a Walls Of Jericho and how Punk escaped the Walls and locked in the Vice, and then immediately locked it in a second time causing Jericho to tap was the perfect ending to a wrestling match. It is this that the World Title matches at Wrestlemania should be. Sucks that neither one of their matches were on The Best PPV Matches set. If it truly was a compilation of the, one, hell even both of their matches should have been on it.

      Austin/Rock II was mostly great, I felt they overbooked at the end with the billions of chair shots and such. IMO, that should have been saved from the next night’s RAW to seal the deal on Austin’s heel turn. Speaking of the turn, Austin stated that looking bad, he wished he never would have done it. I agree with him because while I found his comedic stuff funny, it wasn’t THE Stone Cold. So since he regrets the heel turn, it could have been avoided had Austin carried over his feud with HHH from No Way out into WM to conclude it. Meanwhile, Taker and Rock could have the match they should have had at WM, which has yet to happen.

      WM28…..I agree the GM Tag Match was a joke. That was filler. The ending made it even worse. How stupid was Ryder to be gullible enough to think Eve suddenly became good?!! As bad as that one was though, the King/Cole was…..can’t describe it. It was THAT BAD. As if WM27 wasn’t bad enough lol!!! Considering how the crowd was after HIAC, they should have done at WM28 what they also should have done at WM25, put the true main event, the one match everyone is looking forward to the most, the match people will be so into that they won’t be completely into what follows it. I’m talking about Taker-HBK at WM25 and HIAC at WM28. I can see why they’d have Rock-Cena last. I totally get that completely. But I’m just saying. And think about this. Had Rock-Cena not happened then, then this meeting at WM29 would truly live up the “Once In A Lifetime” hype and there would be no HIAC stopping anyone from getting into Rock-Cena this year. Which means it’d better off if it didn’t happen last year, although I fully understand and accept why it did. Again, I’m just saying.

      While I feel every match on a PPV card should be given proper time in terms of the match as well as the build (like it was in the early 90′s and prior), I’m not really against fillers if done right. Look at the PPV’s in 98. The IYH shows, most of, if not all of them were consisted of fillers. Just a few examples:
      KOTR: Outlaws vs The New Midnight Express
      Breakdown 98 – Edge vs Owen Hart, Gangrel vs D-Lo Brown, Droz vs Mero.
      Judgment Day – Al Snow vs Mero

      However, those matches, while fillers were still entertaining to me so IMO, those matches could get away with being fillers. The fillers of today’s PPV’s just don’t have quality athletes, athletes of the caliber that the PPV fillers of 98 had. If you watch a filler from today’s era and watch one from 98, you’l lsee a difference and see that the 98 ones were far better than some of today’s top/main built main events/closing show/Title matches.